2025
2025-07-01
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Financial Regulation
Official stated a commitment to financial regulation reforms (Dodd-Frank) while also having criticized Wall Street deregulation, but voted against a major deregulatory bill. This does not contradict the commitment to support regulation but is in tension with his past facilitation of Wall Street access; however, as a deregulatory bill, a 'nay' vote actually aligns with his stated support for financ…
2025-03-14
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Within 48 hours, Schumer moved from a public floor declaration that Democrats were 'unified' against cloture on the House CR to personally voting YEA on cloture on that exact same bill. The reversal is not a re-interpretation but a self-contained position change documented on Senate Democratic Leadership's own site and the Senate roll call record.
2025-03-14
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer publicly announced Democrats would block the GOP funding bill on March 12, then reversed within 48 hours to provide the decisive votes to advance it on March 14. He voted for cloture but against final passage — a parliamentary maneuver that allowed the bill to pass while giving him procedural cover with his base. The reversal triggered widespread calls for his resignation as Democratic lea…
2024
2024-05-16
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Financial Regulation
Official stated a commitment to financial regulation (pushed Dodd-Frank) but voted to disapprove an SEC bulletin that tightened crypto accounting rules. This contradicts his stated support for financial regulation, as overturning a regulatory safeguard undermines the regulatory framework.
2024-05-15
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Israel Policy
Official self-described as 'guardian of Israel' and has generally supported unconditional aid to Israel, but voted against a resolution that would restrict arms sales to Israel based on human rights concerns. A 'nay' on this resolution means he opposed placing conditions on arms sales to Israel, which aligns with his stated position of strong support for Israel.
2023
2023-06-01
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Schumer criticized the Trump tax cuts as giveaways to the wealthy yet voted for the Fiscal Responsibility Act that preserved many of those cuts while adding SNAP work requirements, a compromise that angered progressives in his own party.
2022
2022-12-31
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Schumer publicly pledged to fight corporate money in politics, yet his campaigns have heavily relied on Wall Street and corporate PAC contributions, raising $47.6 million in the 2022 cycle with a majority from large donors.
2022-11-29
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Israel Policy
The official is a self-described 'guardian of Israel' and opposed the Iran nuclear deal, but this vote on the gas stove bill is unrelated to Israel policy. However, the bill proposed protections for gas stoves, which is a domestic energy policy issue. No semantic contradiction with Israel policy exists.
2022-11-29
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, a vote he later disavowed, then co-sponsored and voted for its repeal and the Respect for Marriage Act, illustrating a significant shift on LGBTQ+ rights over his career.
2022-01-19
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: position_evolution
From defending the filibuster in 2017 to leading a carveout in 2022, Schumer shifted on the 60-vote threshold rule.
2015
2015-09-10
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Israel Policy
Official stated he opposed the Iran nuclear deal. This vote is a 'yea' on a resolution to disapprove the deal, which is also a vote to oppose the agreement. No contradiction.
2015-05-22
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: Israel Policy
Official stated that he opposed the Iran nuclear deal, but voted yea on the resolution of disapproval of the deal. Under the legislative framing, a 'yea' on the resolution of disapproval means supporting disapproval of the agreement — therefore, he actually opposed the deal, consistent with his stated position.
2013
2013-11-21
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer in 2005 passionately defended the filibuster as a vital check, warning that eliminating it would create a 'banana republic.' Yet in 2013 he voted to kill the filibuster for most presidential nominations, and in 2022 he pushed to abolish it for voting rights legislation as well. This is a direct reversal on the same Senate rule (the filibuster) affecting the same enforcement mechanism (clot…
2013-11-21
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer in 2005 called filibuster elimination 'doomsday for democracy' and a 'banana republic' tactic, yet in 2013 voted for the nuclear option eliminating it for nominations, and in 2022 pushed to abolish it for voting rights legislation. He later expressed regret — but only after Republicans controlled the Senate. Same enforcement mechanism (cloture), same statutory hook (Senate Rule XXII).
2013-03-26
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer voted for DOMA in 1996, then in 2013 announced support for marriage equality, repudiating his earlier position.
2006
2006-11-15
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Schumer voted to authorize the Iraq War in 2002 but later publicly stated it was a mistake, a clear reversal on a major national security vote.
2005
2005-09-14
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: position_evolution
Schumer voted for the 2002 Iraq War authorization but later said he would not have done so with the knowledge he gained, illustrating an evolution in his public posture on the war.
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
