2025
2025-07-03
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: position_evolution
Burlison criticized 'swampy earmarks' as his reason for voting against the February 2026 CR, yet he enthusiastically voted for and celebrated the One Big Beautiful Bill Act just seven months earlier — a massive spending package that also contained earmarks and negotiated concessions. His selective opposition to earmarks corresponds with whether the overall bill aligns with his Freedom Caucus prior…
2024
2024-11-05
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Burlison introduced a nationwide abortion ban just two months after Missouri voters — whom he represents — enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution by majority vote. While his specific district voted against Amendment 3, the statewide result reflected the will of Missourians he serves in Congress. The two source hosts differ (12news.com vs. nytimes.com), satisfying the independent-outle…
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
