2026
2026-02-23
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Krishnamoorthi publicly demanded 'not a single dollar more' for ICE/DHS at the January 2026 debate, while his opponents noted he had previously voted to fund DHS and had accepted more than $90,000 from Palantir's CTO — an ICE contractor. Krishnamoorthi said he donated the Palantir contributions to immigrant rights groups as soon as the connection came to his attention, but the donations dated back…
2026-01-26
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: position_evolution
Krishnamoorthi voted to 'express gratitude' to ICE in a June 2025 antisemitism resolution (H.Res. 488), then seven months later called for abolishing 'Trump's ICE' at a Senate primary debate and said 'not a single dollar more' for the agency. His opponents seized on the vote. Krishnamoorthi defended it as a vote to condemn antisemitism, noting the ICE language was a Republican addition. The contra…
2025
2025-11-12
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Krishnamoorthi championed the ETHICS Act to ban congressional stock trading, yet reported retirement accounts with Vanguard funds that hold individual stocks. While mutual funds are generally excluded from congressional stock trading ban proposals, the juxtaposition of his 'clean hands' messaging with financial holdings — however permissible — was noted by opponents. His net worth of $3.9 million …
2025-10-22
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Krishnamoorthi co-authored the TikTok ban (H.R. 7521) as a national security hawk, yet simultaneously courted the crypto industry — voting for FIT21, GENIUS Act, and CLARITY Act — and accepted $10 million in super PAC support from Fairshake. The contradiction is between his hawkish posture toward Chinese-controlled technology platforms (TikTok) and his embrace of an industry (crypto) that critics …
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
