2025
2025-07-03 00:00:00+00
BROKE
Broke: Young Kim: signed the April 2025 Medicaid red line, then voted for the cuts
On July 3, 2025, Young Kim voted Yea on H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Roll Call 190, passed 218-214) — legislation the Congressional Budget Office projected would cut roughly $1 trillion from Medicaid over the following decade and leave millions more Americans without health coverage. Only two House Republicans voted no; one, Brian Fitzpatrick, cited the bill's deeper Medicaid cuts.
2025-07-03
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Kim publicly pledged not to vote for a budget resolution that failed to protect Medicaid, then three months later cast the deciding vote for H.R. 1, which contained the largest Medicaid cuts in history. The sources are from different hostnames (ocregister.com vs. dccc.org).
2025-04-14 00:00:00+00
PROMISED
Young Kim: signed the April 2025 Medicaid red line, then voted for the cuts
On April 14, 2025, Young Kim was one of twelve House Republicans who signed a letter to Speaker Mike Johnson stating they "will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations."
2025-03-21
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: position_evolution
Kim publicly touts her personal connection to IVF and cosponsors fertility protection legislation, yet maintains an A+ rating from a prominent anti-abortion group and consistently votes against reproductive rights legislation including the Women's Health Protection Act. Sources are from different hostnames (ocregister.com vs. emilyslist.org).
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
