2025
2025-07-03
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Onder campaigned as a fiscal conservative demanding deficit reduction and 'fiscal responsibility,' yet voted for the OBBBA which the CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt. He touted the bill as 'a huge win' while omitting any mention of its deficit impact or the $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts. The CWA gave him a 0% score for 2025, specifically citing the budget reconciliation as…
2025-05-30
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Onder claims to represent his constituents, yet misses more than four times the average House voting rate and refuses to hold in-person public town halls — instead holding curated, private meetings with business leaders. The Boone County Democratic Party held an 'empty chair town hall' to protest his absence. A Crawford County constituent editorial noted: 'He does not seem to understand Crawford C…
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
