2021
2021-09-25
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Peters' campaign characterized him as a leader among progressive Democrats, but his voting record shows he consistently ranks among the House Democrats most likely to vote against his party, with a 46.15 ProgressivePunch score (worst among California Democrats) and a vote against the Build Back Better Act. Both claims come from the same secondary source (KPBS) which reported both his campaign mess…
2021-09-15
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: platform_vs_vote
Peters publicly positioned himself as favoring lower prescription drug costs for consumers, yet he cast the decisive vote to kill Medicare drug-price negotiation authority in committee — a transformative pricing reform. His top career donor sector is Pharmaceuticals/Health Products ($1.58 million). Peters defended his vote by arguing the bill would suppress medical innovation, not by denying the c…
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
