Position Drift

David G. Valadao — Position over time

Every dated record on this entity, arranged chronologically. Promises and the breaks that followed them; statements made and the conduct that contradicted them; votes that diverged from prior commitments. 5 events on record.

Machine-readable JSON →

2025

2025-07-03 00:00:00+00 BROKE
Broke: David Valadao: signed the April 2025 Medicaid red line, then voted for the cuts
On July 3, 2025, David Valadao voted Yea on H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Roll Call 190, passed 218-214) — legislation the Congressional Budget Office projected would cut roughly $1 trillion from Medicaid over the following decade and leave millions more Americans without health coverage. Only two House Republicans voted no; one, Brian Fitzpatrick, cited the bill's deeper Medicaid cuts.
2025-07-03 VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Valadao was one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump in 2021, calling his conduct 'abhorrent' and 'absolutely an impeachable offense,' but subsequently endorsed Trump in 2024 and voted for the Trump-backed OBBB — a reversal from accountability advocate to party loyalty that critics attribute to political survival in a Trump-dominated GOP.
2025-05-22 VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: reversal
Valadao publicly pledged not to damage Medicaid, which covers two-thirds of his district, then cast the deciding vote for the OBBB which the CBO projected would cut $700 billion from Medicaid — prompting constituents to chant 'I feel betrayed' at protests and leading both of his Democratic opponents to accuse him of lying.

2024

2024-10-08 VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Valadao voted against the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, calling it 'reckless,' then lobbied for at least $168 million from the same law for his district and publicly celebrated the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant that it funded — a classic 'Voted No, Took the Dough' pattern that drew national attention.

What this view assembles

  • Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
  • Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
  • Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
  • Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).

This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.