70
Affordable Housing and Rent Stabilization
District priority: 92/100
Alignment: -10
District pattern: Strong support for tenant protections, rent caps, affordable housing funding, and opposition to policies seen as favoring developers over renters. High renter share and cost-burdened households drive this.
Voting record shows no clear support for major housing affordability measures; positions on tax and regulatory bills suggest alignment with supply-side or ownership-oriented approaches rather than tenant protection priorities dominant in the district.
65
Environmental Protection and Climate Action
District priority: 90/100
Alignment: -45
District pattern: Overwhelming support for stringent air quality, emissions, and environmental justice policies, including California's Clean Air Act waivers and regulation of port/industrial pollution.
Voted against multiple EPA rules supporting California's nonroad engine and harbor craft emissions standards, diverging from a district that strongly backs state environmental authority and pollution controls in port-adjacent communities.
60
Civil Rights and Voting Rights
District priority: 88/100
Alignment: -20
District pattern: Very strong support for voting rights protections, anti-discrimination measures, and opposition to policies perceived as restricting ballot access or targeting immigrant communities.
Votes against procedural and election-related measures, combined with support for certain law enforcement and regulatory bills, suggest weaker alignment with the district's civil rights priorities than expected for this electorate.
50
Healthcare Access and Prescription Drug Costs
District priority: 86/100
Alignment: +5
District pattern: Broad support for ACA protections, Medi-Cal expansion, drug price negotiation, and reproductive healthcare access.
No affirmative healthcare-expansion votes appear in the record; support for fraud-enforcement and tax-relief measures does not substitute for the district's demand for accessible, affordable care.
55
Immigration and Immigrant Services
District priority: 85/100
Alignment: -15
District pattern: Strong support for immigrant integration, sanctuary policies, family reunification, and opposition to restrictive immigration enforcement.
No positive votes on immigrant protection legislation appear in the record; positions on enforcement and regulatory bills lean toward restrictionist frameworks inconsistent with the district's large immigrant and mixed-status household population.
45
Labor Rights and Worker Protections
District priority: 83/100
Alignment: -5
District pattern: Support for collective bargaining, wage standards, workplace safety, and measures protecting gig and low-wage workers.
Record shows limited engagement with core labor priorities; votes on tax and regulatory measures suggest a mixed orientation rather than consistent support for the district's union and worker constituencies.
60
Public Safety and Policing Reform
District priority: 80/100
Alignment: -30
District pattern: Supports balanced public safety investments including violence prevention, accountability, and community services; opposes heavy-handed federal enforcement expansion without oversight.
Support for GUARD Act and law-enforcement-oriented bills without corresponding accountability measures deviates from the district's preference for reform-oriented, prevention-focused public safety policy.
55
Education Funding and Student Debt Relief
District priority: 78/100
Alignment: -25
District pattern: Support for increased public school funding, universal pre-K, tuition relief, and educator support.
Voted against the educator expense deduction expansion despite district interest in educator retention; overall record shows no visible support for major education investment priorities.
30
Transportation and Infrastructure
District priority: 76/100
Alignment: +30
District pattern: Support for transit expansion, road maintenance, and federal infrastructure investment with environmental safeguards.
Support for the Water Resources Development Act and local infrastructure measures aligns partially, but record lacks focus on the transit and multimodal priorities most salient to the district.
40
Tech Industry Regulation, Privacy, and Consumer Protection
District priority: 72/100
Alignment: +10
District pattern: Mixed but leans toward strong privacy protections, antitrust scrutiny of large platforms, and consumer safeguards, with some pro-innovation sentiment.
Support for whistleblower and fraud-victim protections aligns partially, but absence of privacy or antitrust leadership leaves gaps relative to district expectations given its tech-sector presence.
35
Small Business and Economic Development
District priority: 70/100
Alignment: +15
District pattern: Supports small business lending, workforce development, and targeted relief, with skepticism toward policies favoring large corporations or weakening environmental/labor standards.
Support for tax relief and retirement-ownership measures partially aligns, but broader economic development needs of the district's small business and mixed-income communities are not clearly reflected.
40
Federal Fiscal Policy and Taxation
District priority: 65/100
Alignment: -20
District pattern: Prefers progressive taxation, protection of social programs, and opposition to cuts to safety-net spending; wary of deficit-reduction proposals that shift costs to working families.
Votes on fraud, tax relief, and procedural measures suggest a more austerity-adjacent or enforcement-heavy posture than the district's preference for protecting social insurance and progressive revenue.
