SUBJECT-6902.dossier · instrument · status: active
IC
subject of file

Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.

Separate Abu Ghraib lawsuit filed in 2004, decided in 2005
Tracked because Separate Abu Ghraib lawsuit filed in 2004, decided in 2005 · 9 documented connections
Facts on record0
Connections mapped9
Sources cited11
✦ Thin coverage gap +23 connected to 9 entities · only 0 facts on record · flagged for follow-up research
⚠ no sources
Network web → Timeline → Compare with… → Position Drift → Coverage tone → View on Graph → View Card → Export CSV JSON Dossier ← Entity Directory
Stated vs Revealed
No documented contradictions on file.
PATTERN person → [Legal counsel] → person → [Related legal case] ... 12× PATTERN instrument → [Related legal case] → person → [Legal couns... 12× PATTERN person → [legal] → person → [named plaintiff in litigatio... 8× PATTERN company → [legal] → person → [Related legal case] → instr... 8× PATTERN person → [Presiding judge] → person → [Related legal case... 8×
Connection Map
Key Connections
← Academi (formerly Blackwater) company
Legal Precedent / Litigation Case
Blackwater cited its State Department WPPS contract indemnification and CPA Order 17 as a jurisdictional bar to tort claims in the Ibrahim v. Titan litigation.
← Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid person
named plaintiff in litigation
Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid is listed as a named plaintiff or appellant in Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., a case concerning alleged torture and abuse by U.S. contractors at Abu Ghraib.
→ Saleh v. Titan instrument
related legal case
Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. is explicitly listed alongside Saleh v. Titan in the known entities database as companion cases.
→ U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia institution
court jurisdiction
Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. was litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, as listed in the known entities database alongside the case.
→ Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals institution
appeals court
The case was appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is listed in the known entities database directly below Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.
← Michael Buchanan person
legal proceeding
Michael Buchanan was involved in the legal case 'Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.' as a party or related person.
Facts (0)
No facts yet.
All Connections (9)
→ KBR company
legal case association secondary since 2025
Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. is a legal case involving alleged abuse by contractors in Iraq; Titan Corp. is a former KBR (then a Halliburton subsidiary) subcontractor on similar logistics work in Iraq. Both entities are named in related litigation (Saleh v. Titan). The case is listed in the known entities alongside KBR and related litigation.
→ Saleh v. Titan instrument
related legal case primary since 2025
Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. is explicitly listed alongside Saleh v. Titan in the known entities database as companion cases.
court jurisdiction primary since 2025
Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. was litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, as listed in the known entities database alongside the case.
appeals court primary since 2025
The case was appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is listed in the known entities database directly below Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.
→ L-3 Services company
defendant entity secondary since 2025
L-3 Services is listed in the known entities database alongside the Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. and Saleh v. Titan cases as a related defendant entity in the same litigation.
Related legal case inferential since 2006
This case name appears in the entity list alongside other legal entities associated with Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari, indicating it is a related or parallel lawsuit involving similar allegations against defense contractors.
← Michael Buchanan person
legal proceeding primary since Unknown
Michael Buchanan was involved in the legal case 'Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.' as a party or related person.
named plaintiff in litigation primary since 2008
Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid is listed as a named plaintiff or appellant in Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., a case concerning alleged torture and abuse by U.S. contractors at Abu Ghraib.
Legal Precedent / Litigation Case primary since 2004
Blackwater cited its State Department WPPS contract indemnification and CPA Order 17 as a jurisdictional bar to tort claims in the Ibrahim v. Titan litigation.
Sources (11)
2022-08-11 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2022-08-11) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2025-08-07 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2025-08-07) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2023-08-10 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2023-08-10) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2018-08-20 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2018-08-20) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2021-08-17 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2021-08-17) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2024-08-08 ↗ SEC EDGAR: filing — Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. (2024-08-08) sec_filing Processed 📜 Receipt
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. — Court records (no results) court_document Processed 📜 Receipt
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. — Corporate registrations (no results) government_disclosure Processed 📜 Receipt
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. — USASpending contracts (no results) contract Processed 📜 Receipt
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. — Parliamentary records (no results) parliamentary_record Processed 📜 Receipt
2026 UNVERIFIED Research: Ibrahim v. Titan Corp. — Lobbying disclosures (no results) government_disclosure Processed 📜 Receipt