SCORECARD · ANDY BIGGS in office since 2025-01-03

Andy Biggs dossier →

Republican U.S. House · AZ-5 full conduct profile →
23/100
LOW CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
0
Connection density20%
50
Donor influence10%
4
Fact density10%
14
Constituency deviation5%
10
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • other / unclassified
    Interested donors: Let'S Get To Work PAC
    Let'S Get To Work PAC (amounts: $10,000 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • party & leadership pacs
    Interested donors: Huck PAC
    Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: party & leadership pacs
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Let'S Get To Work PAC, Buckeye Liberty PAC (amounts: $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • ideological & single-issue
    Interested donors: Patriot Freedom PAC Inc
    Patriot Freedom PAC Inc (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • party committees
    Interested donors: House Freedom Fund
    House Freedom Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
  • other candidates' committees
    Interested donors: Huck PAC
    Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
All silence flags for Andy Biggs →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1878 votes on file. 0 aligned, 0 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 0

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

No documented contradiction analyses on file.

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/andy-biggs
CitationGoblin House. "Andy Biggs — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 15, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/andy-biggs.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.