SCORECARD · ANGELA ALSOBROOKS in office since 2025-01-03

Angela Alsobrooks dossier →

Democratic U.S. Senate · MD full conduct profile →
54/100
MODERATE CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
0
Connection density20%
78
Donor influence10%
86
Fact density10%
40
Constituency deviation5%
12
Voting misalignment5%
1

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Angela Alsobrooks →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

40% of 5 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • Continuing Resolution to Fund the Federal Government
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Maryland has the second-highest share of federal workers in the nation (~17% of Prince George's County workforce alone); Alsobrooks's No vote, while based on a demand for Affordable Care Act premium tax credit extensions, prolonged a shutdown that disproportionately hurt her own constituents.
  • Joint Resolutions of Disapproval to Block Arms Sales to Israel
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Reversed her 2024 campaign promise to Jewish leaders that she would maintain US military aid to Israel; the vote fractured her relationship with a key constituency and aligns her with the progressive wing of the party on Middle East policy.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 0

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

No documented contradiction analyses on file.

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/angela-alsobrooks
CitationGoblin House. "Angela Alsobrooks — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 16, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/angela-alsobrooks.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.