SCORECARD · CHUCK SCHUMER in office since 1999

Chuck Schumer dossier →

Democratic U.S. Senate · NY-NY Statewide full conduct profile →
83/100
HIGH CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
100
Connection density20%
100
Donor influence10%
17
Fact density10%
100
Constituency deviation5%
38
Voting misalignment5%
3

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Abolishing the Senate filibuster to pass voting rights legislation 365 days silent
    Expected position: As Democratic Leader, Schumer faced intense pressure to eliminate the filibuster to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Activists demanded he use the 'nuclear option' as many Republicans argued he would. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer repeatedly brought voting rights legislation to the floor and organized the January 2022 showdown vote to change the filibuster rules. However, he never publicly called for full abolition of the filibuster; he instead proposed a 'talking filibuster' carveout, which failed when Senators Manchin and Sinema opposed it. He was highly vocal on voting rights but avoided endorsing the transformative rule change many progressives demanded. Primary URL: https://www.schumer.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/majority-leader-schumer-floor-remarks-on-the-senates-ongoing-work-to-protect-americans-voting-rights
  • Antisemitic protests and encampments at Columbia University 206 days silent
    Expected position: As the Senate Majority Leader, the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in America, and self-described 'guardian of the Jewish people' representing New York, Schumer would be expected to forcefully and publicly condemn antisemitism on his home-state campus. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: A GOP-led House Education and Workforce Committee report alleged Schumer advised then-Columbia president Minouche Shafik that the school's 'political problems are really only among Republicans' and his staff encouraged administrators that the 'best strategy is to keep heads down.' While Schumer's office denied the claim, protests grew increasingly violent — a Jewish student's jewelry was ripped off on the way to synagogue, Israeli flags were burned, and over 100 people were arrested after occupying Hamilton Hall. Former Ambassador David Friedman publicly demanded 'where the hell are you?' and pro-Israel protesters called Schumer a 'traitor.' During this window Schumer was actively giving floor speeches on other topics and managing the foreign aid package. Primary URL: https://nypost.com/2024/10/31/us-news/chuck-schumer-labeled-traitor-after-damning-report-reveals-he-quietly-advised-columbia-leaders-to-ignore-criticism-of-campus-antisemitism/
  • Calling for a ceasefire in Gaza 146 days silent
    Expected position: As the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in U.S. history and Senate Majority Leader, Schumer would be expected to weigh in on the humanitarian crisis and civilian casualties in Gaza. Many Democrats and progressive groups urged him to support a ceasefire. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer gave a major Senate floor speech on March 14, 2024, criticizing Netanyahu and calling for new Israeli elections, but he did not call for a permanent ceasefire. He was active on Middle East policy, delivering that speech and voting for aid, but remained silent on the ceasefire demand despite sustained pressure from within his own caucus and from constituents. Primary URL: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/majority-leader-schumer-delivers-major-address-on-the-floor-of-the-united-states-senate-on-israel
  • NYC congestion pricing pause 25 days silent
    Expected position: As Senate Majority Leader from New York and a longtime supporter of public transit funding, Schumer was expected to publicly oppose Gov. Hochul's indefinite pause on congestion pricing. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer made no public statement on the congestion pricing pause during this window, while he actively commented on immigration policy and Supreme Court decisions. A Gothamist article documented his silence alongside Rep. Jeffries. Primary URL: https://gothamist.com/news/why-hasnt-chuck-schumer-said-anything-about-congestion-pricing
  • Trump Cabinet nominees in the post-2024 transition 17 days silent
    Expected position: As Senate Majority Leader and the public face of Democratic opposition, Schumer would be expected to aggressively denounce controversial Trump nominees like Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer was 'uncharacteristically restrained' according to the New York Times, repeatedly telling reporters 'we're going to wait and see what happens in each of these instances before commenting.' He passed up multiple television camera-ready opportunities to criticize nominees. Schumer's colleagues endorsed the move, with Sen. Chris Van Hollen saying 'why get in the middle of a food fight?' During this same window, Schumer was actively negotiating judicial confirmations and issuing statements on Senate procedure. Primary URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/22/us/politics/schumer-trump-republicans.html
  • Biden's cognitive decline in 2024 14 days silent
    Expected position: As Senate Democratic leader, Schumer would be expected to address reports that he witnessed President Biden's mental decline and participated in a cover-up. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer declined to comment on reports that he noticed Biden's mental decline and took part in a 'plan' as detailed in the book 'Original Sin.' He instead pivoted to criticizing the Republican reconciliation bill. Primary URL: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/05/13/cnns_kasie_hunt_drills_schumer_on_witnessing_bidens_cognitive_decline_kasie_were_looking_forward.html
  • Antisemitism and pro-Palestinian protests on NYC campuses 7 days silent
    Expected position: As a senior Jewish senator from New York and self-described 'guardian of Israel,' Schumer would be expected to condemn antisemitism and call for action against protests targeting Jewish students. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Schumer's office remained silent when asked about Mayor Mamdani's day-one orders scrapping antisemitism definitions and synagogue security. He also remained silent on ending a DHS shutdown after deadly shootings. However, during the same period, he was active on other issues like government funding and Israel military aid. Primary URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-silent-mamdani-scraps-antisemitism-definition-synagogue-security
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Delaware North Companies, Inc. Political Action Committee, Assured Guaranty Municpal Corp. PAC, Beyond Finance Employee PAC, Televisaunivision, Inc. Employee Political Action Committee (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Interested donors: Gridiron-PAC
    Gridiron-PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
All silence flags for Chuck Schumer →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 8

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

25.8% of 31 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 1968 (119th) ↗ YEA 2025-03-14
    Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 — cloture on motion to proceed
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Anchor vote for the March 2025 reversal. Not a routine procedural cloture — this was the substantive vote: Republicans needed Democratic cloture support to pass the CR at all, and Schumer's YEA broke a publicly declared caucus position from two days earlier.
  • H.R. 3746 ↗ YEA 2023-06-01
    Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] As Majority Leader, Schumer voted to suspend the debt ceiling and avoid default, accepting concessions he previously opposed, including SNAP work requirements and preservation of some Trump tax cuts. A clear vote prioritizing stability over party platform.
  • S. 316 ↗ YEA 2023-03-29
    Repeal of the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Schumer voted to repeal the 2002 Iraq AUMF — the same authorization he voted for in 2002 as a senator. This marked a complete reversal: he had defended his 2002 vote during his 2004 re-election campaign, saying the invasion was a 'strong show of force.' By 2021 he was leading the charge to repeal it, calling the authorization 'no longer necessary.' The bill passed 66-30 with bipartisan support.
  • H.R. 8404 ↗ YEA 2022-11-29
    Respect for Marriage Act
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Voted to codify same-sex and interracial marriage protections, reversing his 1996 DOMA vote. As Majority Leader, he prioritized the bill's passage and celebrated it as a victory for LGBTQ+ Americans.
  • S.990 ↗ YEA 2011-05-26
    PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Extended surveillance provisions without meaningful reforms, eroding the civil liberties of New Yorkers.
  • S.J.Res. 34 ↗ YEA 2002-10-11
    Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq (2002)
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Schumer voted to authorize the Iraq War, a vote he later called a mistake. The 2002 AUMO had devastating consequences and reshaped Middle East policy. His reversal on the war became a defining arc.
  • H.J.Res. 114 ↗ YEA 2002-10-11
    Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Vote supported a war he later called a mistake, raising credibility questions and contradicting later anti-war stance.
  • H.R.3355 ↗ YEA 1994-08-21
    Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Expanded mass incarceration, disproportionately impacting Black and Latino communities in New York City.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 17

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • Israel Policy SCORE 95
    Official self-described as 'guardian of Israel' and has generally supported unconditional aid to Israel, but voted against a resolution that would restrict arms sales to Israel based on human rights concerns. A 'nay' on this resolution means he opposed placing conditions on arms sales to Israel, which aligns with his stated position of strong support for Israel.
    S.J.Res. 58 2024-05-15
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Schumer publicly announced Democrats would block the GOP funding bill on March 12, then reversed within 48 hours to provide the decisive votes to advance it on March 14. He voted for cloture but against final passage — a parliamentary maneuver that allowed the bill to pass while giving him procedural cover with his base. The reversal triggered widespread calls for his resignation as Democratic leader.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Schumer in 2005 called filibuster elimination 'doomsday for democracy' and a 'banana republic' tactic, yet in 2013 voted for the nuclear option eliminating it for nominations, and in 2022 pushed to abolish it for voting rights legislation. He later expressed regret — but only after Republicans controlled the Senate. Same enforcement mechanism (cloture), same statutory hook (Senate Rule XXII).
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Schumer in 2005 passionately defended the filibuster as a vital check, warning that eliminating it would create a 'banana republic.' Yet in 2013 he voted to kill the filibuster for most presidential nominations, and in 2022 he pushed to abolish it for voting rights legislation as well. This is a direct reversal on the same Senate rule (the filibuster) affecting the same enforcement mechanism (cloture), though the scope expanded from judicial nominations to legislation over time.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Schumer criticized the Trump tax cuts as giveaways to the wealthy yet voted for the Fiscal Responsibility Act that preserved many of those cuts while adding SNAP work requirements, a compromise that angered progressives in his own party.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Within 48 hours, Schumer moved from a public floor declaration that Democrats were 'unified' against cloture on the House CR to personally voting YEA on cloture on that exact same bill. The reversal is not a re-interpretation but a self-contained position change documented on Senate Democratic Leadership's own site and the Senate roll call record.
  • Israel Policy SCORE 85
    Official stated that he opposed the Iran nuclear deal, but voted yea on the resolution of disapproval of the deal. Under the legislative framing, a 'yea' on the resolution of disapproval means supporting disapproval of the agreement — therefore, he actually opposed the deal, consistent with his stated position.
    H.R.2146 2015-05-22
  • Israel Policy SCORE 80
    Official stated he opposed the Iran nuclear deal. This vote is a 'yea' on a resolution to disapprove the deal, which is also a vote to oppose the agreement. No contradiction.
    S.J.Res. 1 2015-09-10
  • Israel Policy SCORE 75
    The official is a self-described 'guardian of Israel' and opposed the Iran nuclear deal, but this vote on the gas stove bill is unrelated to Israel policy. However, the bill proposed protections for gas stoves, which is a domestic energy policy issue. No semantic contradiction with Israel policy exists.
    H.R. 8404 2022-11-29
  • Financial Regulation SCORE 65
    Official stated a commitment to financial regulation reforms (Dodd-Frank) while also having criticized Wall Street deregulation, but voted against a major deregulatory bill. This does not contradict the commitment to support regulation but is in tension with his past facilitation of Wall Street access; however, as a deregulatory bill, a 'nay' vote actually aligns with his stated support for financial regulation.
    H.R. 1 / One Big Beautiful Bill Act 2025-07-01
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    From defending the filibuster in 2017 to leading a carveout in 2022, Schumer shifted on the 60-vote threshold rule.
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    Schumer voted for the 2002 Iraq War authorization but later said he would not have done so with the knowledge he gained, illustrating an evolution in his public posture on the war.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Schumer voted for DOMA in 1996, then in 2013 announced support for marriage equality, repudiating his earlier position.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Schumer voted to authorize the Iraq War in 2002 but later publicly stated it was a mistake, a clear reversal on a major national security vote.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Schumer voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, a vote he later disavowed, then co-sponsored and voted for its repeal and the Respect for Marriage Act, illustrating a significant shift on LGBTQ+ rights over his career.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Schumer publicly pledged to fight corporate money in politics, yet his campaigns have heavily relied on Wall Street and corporate PAC contributions, raising $47.6 million in the 2022 cycle with a majority from large donors.
  • Financial Regulation SCORE 50
    Official stated a commitment to financial regulation (pushed Dodd-Frank) but voted to disapprove an SEC bulletin that tightened crypto accounting rules. This contradicts his stated support for financial regulation, as overturning a regulatory safeguard undermines the regulatory framework.
    H.J.Res. 109 2024-05-16
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/chuck-schumer
CitationGoblin House. "Chuck Schumer — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 17, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/chuck-schumer.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.