SCORECARD · CLIFF BENTZ accountability readout

Cliff Bentz dossier →

Republican U.S. House · OR-2 full conduct profile →
66/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
95
Connection density20%
29
Donor influence10%
35
Fact density10%
67
Constituency deviation5%
57
Voting misalignment5%
1

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Silence on the contradiction between accepting federal infrastructure dollars and voting against the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 1347 days silent
    Expected position: As a representative who voted against the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law while subsequently celebrating federal funding arriving in his district, Bentz would be expected to explain the inconsistency. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Bentz voted against the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in November 2021. Yet he subsequently (1) urged President Biden for 'sufficient investment in Coos Bay Port' (May 2022), (2) introduced legislation expanding The Dalles water supply infrastructure (April 2025), and (3) publicly celebrated FEMA authorizing funds to fight the Highland Fire, thanking the White House for protecting 'homes, infrastructure, and natural resources' (July 2025). Bentz was active on social media and in Congress throughout this period but did not address the inconsistency between his no vote and his subsequent demands for federal investment in his district. Primary URL: https://www.bendbulletin.com/2025/08/25/bentz-plans-to-meet-with-small-groups-on-district-tour-instead-of-large-town-halls/
  • Abandonment of in-person town halls in favor of controlled-access group meetings and telephone town halls 189 days silent
    Expected position: As the sole Republican representing Oregon in Congress — and representing the 7th largest, most rural district in the nation — Bentz would be expected to maintain robust, public, in-person town halls accessible to all constituents. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Bentz held four in-person town halls in February 2025 (Pendleton, La Grande, Boardman, Baker City) then abruptly stopped. After the NRCC advised members to avoid in-person town halls, he shifted to telephone town halls and small-group gatherings. In August 2025, he addressed the Rotary Club in The Dalles — a private event with a 60-person maximum — while protesters gathered outside chanting 'Where's the town hall meeting Cliff?' and 'Face your voters!' A constituent noted Bentz hadn't held a town hall in The Dalles in three years. On September 5, 2025, Bentz formally announced he would no longer hold in-person town halls, citing 'hostile behavior from activists' and 'disruptive tactics.' He defended the shift in media interviews, telling OPB: 'Is it important that I spend time with them? If it's productive... yes. If it's for people to engage in shouting matches, then no.' Constituents called the telephone town halls 'overly scripted, with curated questions and little chance to participate.' Primary URL: https://www.bendbulletin.com/2025/08/25/bentz-plans-to-meet-with-small-groups-on-district-tour-instead-of-large-town-halls/
  • other / unclassified
    American Bakers Association American Bakers PAC, Republican Mainstreet Partnership PAC, American Wood Council PAC (Woodpac), American Revival PAC, Tzedek PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,500 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • other candidates' committees
    Interested donors: Huck PAC
    Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Bringing Republican Excellence To Town PAC (Brettpac), Buckeye Liberty PAC, Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans (Emmer PAC) (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • party committees
    Republican Governance Group/Tuesday Group PAC (amounts: $8,000 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
  • ideological & single-issue
    Interested donors: Oregon Right To Life PAC
    Oregon Right To Life PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    J.R. Simplot Company Political Action Committee, Avangrid PAC, Transcanada USA Services PAC, Ida-PAC, Calportland Company Political Action Committee (Cpcc-PAC), Woolpert, Inc Political Action Committee (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • party & leadership pacs
    Republican Governance Group/Tuesday Group PAC, Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans (Emmer PAC) (amounts: $8,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: party & leadership pacs
All silence flags for Cliff Bentz →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 6

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

60% of 10 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • One Big Beautiful Bill Act — $4.5 trillion budget framework with $1.02 trillion in Medicaid cuts by 2034, SNAP restrictions, and permanent extension of 2017 tax cuts
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Bentz was the only member of Oregon's congressional delegation to vote yes. Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek said the bill would cut $15 billion in federal dollars to Oregon. Approximately 40% of Bentz's district is on the Oregon Health Plan (Medicaid). Bentz served on the subcommittee that helped craft the Medicaid cuts. Constituents protested him across the district.
  • H.R. 8404 ↗ NAY 2022-12-08
    Respect for Marriage Act — Federal protection for same-sex and interracial marriages; codifies marriage equality
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Bentz flip-flopped from yes (July 2022) to no (December 2022), one of only 10 House Republicans to reverse. He offered no public explanation. The bill passed 258-169-1 with 39 Republican votes.
  • H.R. 5376 ↗ NAY 2022-08-12
    Inflation Reduction Act — Medicare drug price negotiation, $35 insulin cap, clean energy tax credits, ACA premium subsidy extension
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Bentz voted against allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices. His district skews older (median age 42.8, 16% of residents 70+), meaning a large share of his constituents rely on Medicare and would benefit from lower drug prices.
  • H.R. 8373 ↗ NAY 2022-07-21
    Right to Contraception Act — Would codify the right to access birth control
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Bentz opposed codifying the right to contraception. He is also a self-described believer in personhood (life begins at conception) and supports making both abortion and birth control illegal. This stands in contrast to the more moderate social views in parts of his district.
  • H.R. 3684 ↗ NAY 2021-11-05
    Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act — $1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, broadband, and water systems
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Bentz voted against the bill but subsequently sought and celebrated federal infrastructure funding for Port of Coos Bay and The Dalles water supply. His district relies heavily on infrastructure: 69.1% homeownership with 73.5% of workers driving alone.
  • H.R. 5744 ↗ NAY 2021-10-21
    Contempt of Congress resolution against Steve Bannon for defying a subpoena from the January 6th Select Committee
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Despite voting to create the Jan. 6 commission, Bentz voted against holding Bannon in contempt for obstructing it. This inconsistency earned him an 'F' grade from Republican Accountability.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 4

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Bentz voted to object to Pennsylvania's electoral votes citing 'irregularities,' but in the same interview admitted he had seen 'no evidence' of those irregularities and did not accept Trump's fraud claims. The East Oregonian called it a 'major misstep' that raised 'questions about his political judgment.'
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Bentz campaigned as a deficit hawk but voted for the Big Beautiful Bill, which the CBO projected would add trillions to the national debt. The East Oregonian noted this directly contradicted his 'past vows not to add to the national deficit.'
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Bentz voted yes on the Respect for Marriage Act in July 2022, then flipped to no on final passage in December 2022. He was one of 10 House Republicans to reverse without public explanation — declining to disclose his reasoning even as other GOP members who flipped published statements justifying their change.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Bentz voted to create the Jan. 6 commission — a rare bipartisan act — but then voted against holding Bannon in criminal contempt for defying the very commission he authorized. This earned him an 'F' democracy grade from Republican Accountability.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-b000668
CitationGoblin House. "Cliff Bentz — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-b000668.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.