SCORECARD · KAT CAMMACK accountability readout

Kat Cammack dossier →

Republican U.S. House · FL-3 full conduct profile →
72/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
95
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
41
Donor influence10%
64
Fact density10%
94
Constituency deviation5%
90
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 8

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Kat Cammack →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

25% of 8 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 1 YEA 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Cammack voted yea on legislation the CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to deficits and cut approximately $1 trillion from Medicaid and SNAP. She touted the bill as protecting rural hospitals and preventing a tax hike, claiming it would benefit over 452,000 taxpayers in FL-03. Her district has 11% poverty, median household income of $60,712, and thousands relying on Medicaid and SNAP. The AFL-CIO gave her a 0% rating for 2025. Only 2 Republicans voted nay.
  • H.J.Res. 11 ↗ YEA 2021-01-06
    Objection to 2020 Electoral College Certification (January 6, 2021)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Cammack's first act upon being sworn in as a member of Congress for four days was to object to the electoral certification, citing 'thousands of sworn affidavits detailing specific election irregularities' that state officials stated did not constitute evidence of widespread fraud. Her district's largest county (Alachua) voted for Biden by approximately 60%.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Cammack voted against the 2023 debt ceiling deal as insufficiently fiscally conservative, yet voted yea on the OBBBA which the CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit — roughly ten times the deficit impact of the bill she opposed. The fiscal-conservative principle was applied selectively: deficit spending negotiated by a Democratic administration was objectionable, but a Republican-sponsored tax-cut-and-spending package that added far more to the debt was acceptable.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Cammack's personal story of homelessness resonates with constituents struggling with poverty, yet she voted for an OBBBA that cut approximately $1 trillion from Medicaid and SNAP — programs on which thousands of her constituents rely. She also refuses to hold in-person town halls where affected constituents could directly question her about these votes.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Cammack champions restrictive abortion legislation while sharing her own traumatic ectopic pregnancy experience where she 'had to plead' for treatment — a scenario that became more legally fraught in restrictive states precisely because of laws like those she supports. Critics called her a 'hypocrite' for this dissonance.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001039
CitationGoblin House. "Kat Cammack — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001039.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.