SCORECARD · ANGIE CRAIG accountability readout

Angie Craig dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · MN-2 full conduct profile →
67/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
41
Donor influence10%
90
Fact density10%
62
Constituency deviation5%
12
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Angie Craig →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

20% of 10 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 875 ↗ NAY 2025-06-26
    Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] After voting for the Laken Riley Act just months earlier, Craig voted against this bill to deport noncitizens convicted of DUI — a notable split that drew sharp criticism from Republican campaign arms and highlighted the evolving tension in her immigration record as she ran for Senate.
  • H.R. 29 ↗ YEA 2025-01-07
    Laken Riley Act
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Craig was the only Minnesota Democrat to vote for this bill, which expanded mandatory detention for undocumented immigrants. She reversed herself 14 months later in a Star Tribune op-ed, calling her vote a 'wrong decision' amid a heated Senate primary.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Craig was one of only 48 House Democrats to vote for the Laken Riley Act in January 2025 — the only Minnesota Democrat to do so. Fourteen months later, amid a competitive Democratic Senate primary and after ICE's Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota, she published an op-ed stating she regretted her vote. Her primary opponent, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, had repeatedly attacked her for the vote.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Craig has positioned herself as a fighter against Big Pharma, sponsoring insulin cost-cap legislation and championing Medicare drug price negotiation. However, her top campaign contributors include health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, and health professionals — industries that have lobbied against Medicare negotiation and drug pricing reforms.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001119
CitationGoblin House. "Angie Craig — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001119.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.