SCORECARD · MIKE COLLINS accountability readout

Mike Collins dossier →

Republican U.S. House · GA-10 full conduct profile →
63/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
54
Connection density20%
56
Donor influence10%
46
Fact density10%
94
Constituency deviation5%
27
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Mike Collins →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

50% of 4 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 1 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (119th Congress)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Collins voted for legislation CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to the deficit and cut $1 trillion from Medicaid and SNAP over ten years, directly contradicting his stated fiscal conservative platform. GA-10's rural counties — including Jasper, Newton, Morgan, and others — have significant Medicaid enrollment among lower-income agricultural and manufacturing workers; rural Georgia hospitals operate with Medicaid as a primary payer. His yes aligned with party but voted against the healthcare interests of his lowest-income rural constituents.
  • H.R. 5376 ↗ NAY_UNVERIFIED 2022-08-12
    Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Collins voted against the IRA, which included agricultural conservation funding and rural energy provisions. GA-10 includes significant agricultural operations and rural communities that benefit from USDA conservation cost-sharing programs funded by the IRA. His nay aligned with party but voted against a bill whose agricultural conservation provisions had direct financial relevance to rural constituents.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 1

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Collins's stated fiscal conservatism — including his nay on the Fiscal Responsibility Act for being insufficiently austere — is directly contradicted by his yes vote on the OBBBA, which CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to the deficit, representing the largest deficit-increasing legislation he has supported and a categorical reversal of the fiscal standard he applied to reject the 2023 debt ceiling deal.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001129
CitationGoblin House. "Mike Collins — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-c001129.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.