SCORECARD · SHARICE DAVIDS accountability readout

Sharice Davids dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · KS-3 full conduct profile →
67/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
95
Contradiction risk25%
48
Connection density20%
68
Donor influence10%
80
Fact density10%
57
Constituency deviation5%
14
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 8

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Sharice Davids →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1869 votes on file. 3 aligned, 4 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Davids campaigns as a reformer pushing to ban congressional stock trading, yet her campaign continues to accept substantial donations from the Securities & Investment industry ($1.54 million career) and Leadership PACs ($913,297) — the very financial-sector and insider-political networks her proposed reform targets. Both sources are from independent outlets with different hostnames.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Davids voted against the Laken Riley Act in March 2024 when it was part of a larger funding bill, but voted for it twice in January 2025 as a standalone measure under a new Republican trifecta. The flip reflects political repositioning after Trump's reelection rather than a change in the bill's core policy. The vote made her one of only 46 Democrats to support the final version.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-d000629
CitationGoblin House. "Sharice Davids — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-d000629.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.