SCORECARD · JULIE FEDORCHAK in office since 2025-01-03

Julie Fedorchak dossier →

Republican U.S. House · ND-0 full conduct profile →
70/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
72
Donor influence10%
63
Fact density10%
51
Constituency deviation5%
54
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Julie Fedorchak →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

20% of 5 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 1 ↗ YEA 2025-05-22
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Fedorchak voted yea on legislation the CBO projected would add $3.4 trillion to deficits and cause 10+ million to lose health coverage. Her state would lose $1.42 billion in Medicaid funding and 19,000 North Dakotans would lose coverage. She claimed the bill would not reduce benefits and dismissed the CBO as unreliable. Her district has 6.5% poverty and 62.9% homeownership — but is R+39, insulating her from electoral blowback. Top donor sectors Oil & Gas ($76K), Commercial Banks ($52K), and Leadership PACs ($122K) backed the bill's tax and energy provisions. She sits on the Energy and Commerce Committee, which drafted the Medicaid cuts.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Fedorchak claimed the OBBBA Medicaid provisions would not result in 'fewer people receiving those benefits' and would 'protect the program for the people it's intended to help.' The nonpartisan CBO projected 10+ million nationwide coverage losses; the ND Legislative Council estimated 19,000 North Dakotans would lose coverage and the state would lose $1.42 billion in federal Medicaid funding over a decade.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Fedorchak campaigns as a fiscal conservative who demands responsible spending, yet dismissed the CBO's deficit projections for the OBBBA as unreliable and insisted growth would offset the cost — a supply-side argument that contradicts her stated commitment to deficit reduction. The CBO projected the bill would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Fedorchak accepted campaign donations from energy companies she regulated — including $10,000 from North American Coal weeks before approving their mine — while maintaining all decisions were 'based on the factors of the case and nothing else.' The practice was legal and disclosed, but her opponent and primary challengers argued it undermined public confidence in regulatory independence.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-f000482
CitationGoblin House. "Julie Fedorchak — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-f000482.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.