SCORECARD · VICENTE GONZALEZ accountability readout

Vicente Gonzalez dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · TX-34 full conduct profile →
72/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
56
Donor influence10%
84
Fact density10%
57
Constituency deviation5%
55
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Gaza ceasefire and AIPAC funding relationship (October 2023 – February 2024) 144 days silent
    Expected position: As a Democrat whose district includes constituents who organized protests specifically about his AIPAC funding and complicity in Gaza, Gonzalez would be expected to address the protests publicly, explain his position on a ceasefire, and clarify whether AIPAC contributions influence his Israel policy. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: In February 2024, protesters gathered outside Gonzalez's office in the Rio Grande Valley arguing that his acceptance of 'hundreds of thousands of dollars' from AIPAC made him 'complicit' in civilian deaths in Gaza. Organizer Victoria Oceguera stated that most calls to the office were 'read by staff' but 'not communicated to the congressman properly.' During this same window, Gonzalez was highly active in Congress — voting on Ukraine aid resolutions (March 2024), the TikTok ban (March 2024), and condemning the abduction of Ukrainian children — but no public statement on the protests, his AIPAC relationship, or a ceasefire position appears in his press releases or local media. Primary URL: https://www.tpr.org/noticias-clips/2024-02-13/protesta-por-donaciones-que-el-congresista-vicente-gonzalez-recibe-regularmente-de-un-grupo-israeli
  • Sanctuary cities legislation (No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act, February 2025) 17 days silent
    Expected position: Gonzalez voted Yea on the Laken Riley Act in January 2025, breaking with most Texas Democrats. When the House prepared to vote on the sanctuary cities defunding bill weeks later, Gonzalez's position was of acute interest to both immigration advocates and the GOP. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Gonzalez told POLITICO in February 2025 that he would likely 'stay out of people's way' on the sanctuary cities bill, saying 'I don't have sanctuary cities in my district.' This signaled a departure from his 2024 'Nay' vote on a similar bill. He was active during this window — voting on NLRB-related measures and holding constituent outreach — but offered no town hall, press release, or detailed statement explaining his evolving position on immigration-enforcement legislation beyond the single quote to POLITICO. Primary URL: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/18/democrats-advocacy-groups-gop-sanctuary-city-bill-00203939
  • party committees
    Blue Dog PAC, Chc Bold PAC, New Democrat Coalition Action Fund (amounts: $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $7,500 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
  • ideological & single-issue
    Humane Society Legislative Fund PAC, Progressive Turnout Project, No Labels PAC, Defend The Vote, Equality PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,500 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • other candidates' committees
    Interested donors: Barragan For Congress
    Barragan For Congress (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
  • other / unclassified
    Welcomepac, Elect Dems Now PAC, Stop Project 2025 (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Vulcan Materials Co. P. A. C., Lhc Group, Inc PAC, Chicago Board Options Exchange PAC (Cboe PAC), Nelnet Inc PAC (Nelnet PAC), Qc Holdings, Inc. Political Action Committee, Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. PAC, Cng Holdings, Inc. PAC, Nextdecade Corporation Political Action Committee, Coupang, Inc. Company PAC (Coupac) (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $6,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $7,500 (2024), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Fair Shot PAC, People Helping People, PAC To The Future, Progressive Americans For Democracy, Democrats Reshaping America (Dreampac), Hmp, Purpose PAC, Backpac, Doing Right - Results Action Unity Leadership PAC, Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC), Evergreen PAC, Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, Reviving American Jobs Again PAC, Serving Our Country (Soc) PAC, La Bamba PAC, All In PAC, Timber PAC, Budwinski PAC, Democratic Majority Fund, Juntos PAC, Innovation For Good PAC, Puget PAC, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $9,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $7,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $6,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $8,500 (2026), $5,500 (2026), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • law & lobbying firms
    American Association For Justice PAC, Federal Bipartisan Voluntary Public Affairs Committee Of The, American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC (amounts: $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: law & lobbying firms
All silence flags for Vicente Gonzalez →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

16.7% of 6 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • SAVE Act of 2025
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Ten months after voting Yea on the identical bill, Gonzalez voted Nay — a complete reversal on the same policy question (same statutory hook, same enforcement mechanism, same population affected). He was one of only two Democrats (with Rep. Don Davis) who supported the 2024 version but opposed the 2025 version. The NRCC immediately attacked the flip. Gonzalez's own office offered no public explanation for the change.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Gonzalez voted Yea on the SAVE Act in July 2024, making him one of only five House Democrats to support proof-of-citizenship voting requirements. Ten months later, he voted Nay on the identical bill (H.R. 22) — a complete reversal on the same policy question. NRCC targeted him for the flip, calling it 'flip-flopping to allow illegal immigrants to decide our elections.' Gonzalez was one of only two Democrats who voted Yea in 2024 but Nay in 2025, alongside Rep. Don Davis.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Gonzalez publicly disavowed the ACLU to justify his conservative border-security vote, telling POLITICO 'I don't listen to the ACLU.' Yet the ACLU's own scorecard reveals Gonzalez voted with the organization 100% of the time (9 out of 9 scored votes) — a perfect alignment that contradicts his claim of independence from the group. His Laken Riley Act vote broke from ACLU guidance, but the broader voting record tells a different story.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000581
CitationGoblin House. "Vicente Gonzalez — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000581.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.