SCORECARD · SYLVIA R. GARCIA accountability readout

Sylvia R. Garcia dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · TX-29 full conduct profile →
61/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
48
Connection density20%
56
Donor influence10%
54
Fact density10%
78
Constituency deviation5%
17
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Refused to complete Vote Smart's 2024 Political Courage Test — all issue positions were inferred from public record rather than stated directly 309 days silent
    Expected position: Candidates for federal office are expected to provide explicit issue positions on key topics to help voters make informed decisions. Vote Smart repeatedly requested responses. Garcia completed the test for some prior races but refused in 2024. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Garcia was actively campaigning during this period — raising $929K, issuing press releases on immigration, energy accountability, and reproductive rights, and engaging on social media. Vote Smart's Political Courage Test page states that when candidates refuse the test, Vote Smart infers positions from their public record. Multiple of Garcia's issue positions are marked as 'Inferred Position' based on her voting record and public statements rather than direct answers. Primary URL: https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/49734/sylvia-garcia
  • Did not vote on the Laken Riley Act — the only Texas Democrat neither supporting nor opposing the bill, which passed 264-159 with 48 Democrats voting yes 0 days silent
    Expected position: As a Democrat representing a district that is 32.6% foreign-born and 75.8% Hispanic, Garcia would be expected to take a clear stand on mandatory ICE detention legislation. Every other Texas Democrat either voted yes (Cuellar, Gonzalez) or no (the rest of the delegation). Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Garcia was the only Texas Democratic House member who 'did not vote' on the Laken Riley Act, according to the Rio Grande Guardian and confirmed by Vote Smart. Her official voting record shows no position on the bill. During this same period she was actively issuing statements on other immigration matters including protecting undocumented spouses and DREAMers. Her non-vote avoided taking a public position on the first major bill of the Trump presidency — a bill naming after a murdered Georgia nursing student that passed with 48 Democratic votes. Primary URL: https://riograndeguardian.com/stories/cuellar-gonzalez-at-odds-with-fellow-texas-congressional-democrats-over-laken-riley-act,16439
  • party committees
    Interested donors: Chc Bold PAC
    Chc Bold PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
  • other / unclassified
    National Association Of Social Workers Inc. Political Action For Candidate Election (Pace), Elect Dems Now PAC, Democrats Win Fund (amounts: $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, PAC To The Future, Shore PAC, Courage To Change, La Bamba PAC, Doing Right - Results Action Unity Leadership PAC, Ca Luv PAC (California Leadership United For Victory PAC), Fair Shot PAC, Fighting For South Texas PAC, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • ideological & single-issue
    Interested donors: Elect Democratic Women
    Elect Democratic Women (amounts: $6,500 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Zachry Corporation PAC (Zacopac), The Schwan Company PAC, Fair Isaac Corporation Political Action Committee (Fico PAC) (amounts: $6,600 (2024), $5,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
All silence flags for Sylvia R. Garcia →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1867 votes on file. 4 aligned, 4 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Garcia has built a reputation as an environmental justice champion endorsed by LCV, yet her top campaign finance industry is Oil & Gas ($80,000 in 2024). This creates a tension between her environmental voting record and her reliance on fossil fuel industry PAC money. However, her actual voting record consistently supports pro-environment positions, suggesting the donations have not demonstrably swayed her legislative behavior. Both sources are from independent outlets with different hostnames.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Garcia voted against the One Big Beautiful Bill that included No Tax on Tips benefits for hospitality workers in her district, arguing the bill's Medicaid and SNAP cuts outweighed the tip benefit. This is a defensible progressive position — prioritizing safety-net programs over a regressive tax cut — but it placed her at odds with the immediate material interest of tipped workers in Houston. Both sources are from her own official House website.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000587
CitationGoblin House. "Sylvia R. Garcia — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000587.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.