SCORECARD · MARIE GLUESENKAMP PEREZ accountability readout

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · WA-3 full conduct profile →
75/100
HIGH CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
68
Donor influence10%
76
Fact density10%
72
Constituency deviation5%
19
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Marie Gluesenkamp Perez →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1868 votes on file. 1 aligned, 8 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Gluesenkamp Perez voted for the SAVE Act in April 2025 — one of only 4 Democrats — then voted against the SAVE America Act 10 months later in February 2026. Both bills required proof of citizenship for voter registration, but the SAVE America Act added mail-in voting restrictions that conflicted with Washington's vote-by-mail system. She was booed at town halls for the initial SAVE Act vote, and the reversal appears responsive to intense constituent backlash.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Gluesenkamp Perez voted to fund DHS/ICE in January 2026 as one of only 7 Democrats, then within days issued statements criticizing the administration's ICE 'posture and bravado' after her office was vandalized. She sought to have it both ways — voting for agency funding while distancing herself from the agency's enforcement actions under political pressure.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Gluesenkamp Perez voted against the OBBB, which raised the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 — a provision that would benefit homeowners in her district where median home values are $474,300. Her statement opposing the bill did not mention the SALT cap increase at all. She prioritized opposition to the bill's Medicaid cuts and deficit impact over the SALT relief that some of her constituents would have received.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000600
CitationGoblin House. "Marie Gluesenkamp Perez — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-g000600.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.