SCORECARD · RICHARD HUDSON accountability readout

Richard Hudson dossier →

Republican U.S. House · NC-9 full conduct profile →
86/100
CRITICAL CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
95
Connection density20%
84
Donor influence10%
94
Fact density10%
74
Constituency deviation5%
21
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Richard Hudson →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

22.2% of 9 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • Various ↗ NOT_VOTING 2025-12-31
    Attendance Record — 4.7% Missed Votes (345 of 7,294 roll call votes, Jan 2013 - Dec 2025)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] GovTrack reports Hudson missed 345 of 7,294 roll call votes (4.7%), 'much worse than the median of 2.0% among the lifetime records of representatives currently serving.' In 2020, the DCCC ran ads accusing Hudson of being 'AWOL' — missing a vote on troop pay raises. Hudson's campaign pushed back that he supported military pay increases. His poor attendance, combined with his position as Fort Bragg's congressman, made missed defense votes particularly vulnerable to political attack.
  • H.R. 1 ↗ YEA 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act — On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Hudson's Yea vote (218-214) was his defining fiscal vote as NRCC Chairman. He warned defeat 'will have disastrous effects on America's fiscal trajectory' and framed the bill as restoring 'fiscal sanity' and 'slashing deficits by roughly $2 trillion.' The CBO projected the opposite — adding $3-4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. His 10.2% poverty-rate district faced significant Medicaid and SNAP cuts. As NRCC Chairman, his institutional role required him to be a chief promoter of the bill. His Pharma/Health Products donors ($885K) and Koch Industries ($75K) strongly supported the tax provisions. The AFL-CIO scored his vote against working people. He also voted Yea on first passage on May 22, 2025.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 4

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Hudson voted against the 2023 omnibus spending bill, calling it a 'boondoggle' and a 'monstrous spending spree,' yet in the same statement celebrated the $15.5 million of Fort Bragg funding within the bill — funding he and GOP senators had requested. The WRAL editorial noted he was 'happy to trash the legislation, vote to stop it and call it a boondoggle but gush on its help in his district.' Hudson requested at least $3.6 million in earmarks with Senators Burr and Tillis.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Hudson's official press release claimed the OBBB 'slashes deficits by roughly $2 trillion' and restores 'fiscal sanity.' The CBO and independent analysts projected the bill would add $3-4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. A constituent letter in the Courier-Tribune called Hudson's claims 'enthusiastically misleading' and noted the framing about 'preventing the largest tax increase in American history' was factually incorrect.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Hudson claimed in 2021 that there was 'incontrovertible evidence of voter irregularity — if not outright fraud' and voted to reject electoral votes. By 2022, after redistricting made his district more competitive, he answered 'YES' to whether the 2020 election produced 'fair and legitimate results.' The constantcontact.com analysis noted: 'Either Hudson lied in 2021 when he said there was incontrovertible evidence of election fraud or he's lying now when he says the election produced fair and legitimate results.'
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    As NRCC Chairman, Hudson told fellow Republicans in August 2025 that avoiding in-person town halls was about avoiding 'paid progressive activists.' But his own town hall avoidance predated 2025 — the last confirmed in-person Galveston-style town hall on his website was March 2013, his first months in office. His instruction to his colleagues to stop holding in-person forums was consistent with his own long-standing practice of avoiding unscripted, open-floor constituent engagement.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001067
CitationGoblin House. "Richard Hudson — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001067.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.