SCORECARD · J. FRENCH HILL accountability readout

J. French Hill dossier →

Republican U.S. House · AR-2 full conduct profile →
69/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
47
Contradiction risk25%
54
Connection density20%
77
Donor influence10%
91
Fact density10%
79
Constituency deviation5%
40
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 5

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for J. French Hill →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

14.3% of 7 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R.1 ↗ YEA 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (extending tax cuts while restructuring Medicaid, SNAP, and other federal programs)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Hill's vote for the bill directly contrasts with the material interests of his constituents. AR-02 has a 14.4% poverty rate and significant reliance on Medicaid and SNAP. Analyses project the bill's resulting cuts to these programs will negatively impact his constituents, making this an against_constituent vote.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 1

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Hill publicly claimed the bill would protect Medicaid and SNAP for vulnerable Arkansans, but his vote enabled legislation that independent analyses and constituent reports confirmed resulted in significant cuts to those same programs—affecting the very families in his district he pledged to protect.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001072
CitationGoblin House. "J. French Hill — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001072.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.