SCORECARD · HARRIET M. HAGEMAN in office since 2025-01-03

Harriet M. Hageman dossier →

Republican U.S. House · WY-0 full conduct profile →
72/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
95
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
62
Donor influence10%
42
Fact density10%
97
Constituency deviation5%
18
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 8

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Hageman switched to virtual/tele-town halls after contentious in-person forums and cited 'safety concerns' — then continued holding only controlled-format events with pre-screened questions for nearly a year 401 days silent
    Expected position: As Wyoming's sole congressional representative for 582,397 constituents, Hageman would be expected to hold regular open, in-person town halls where voters can ask unfiltered questions — especially after her 2022 campaign pledge to hold town halls in every county annually. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: After contentious town halls in Afton, Laramie, and Wheatland in March 2025 where constituents jeered, booed, and shouted expletives, Hageman announced on March 26, 2025 that she would only hold virtual or tele-town halls 'until such time as it seems safe to resume in-person events,' blaming Democrats and Chuck Schumer for 'domestic terrorism.' Constituent Kelsey Yarzab Yates called it 'a cowardly move.' In Pinedale (July 29, 2025), Hageman justified repealing the EPA endangerment finding, prompting chants of 'Lie, lie!' In Casper (August 19, 2025), she was 'ruthlessly booed' over tariffs and immigration stances. At the Cody town hall (June 17, 2025), she eschewed an open forum, reading pre-screened index-card questions and refusing follow-ups. In Greybull (June 17, 2025), constituents shouted 'We're not Las Vegas!' and 'Keep Wyoming out!' over public lands sales. Hageman was active during this period — voting for H.R. 1, attending the AIPAC Israel delegation, introducing coal legislation, and issuing press releases — proving communicative activity through controlled channels rather than unfiltered public forums. Primary URL: https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news/state/hageman-fearful-for-her-safety-to-host-virtual-town-halls-after-contentious-forums/article_a7ff8e83-6ff6-4681-b231-504170ffa0a8.html
  • Hageman blew off constituents' questions about public lands sales at the Greybull town hall, discarding written questions and claiming she had 'already addressed this issue' 0 days silent
    Expected position: As Wyoming's representative in a state where 46.7% of land is federally owned and public lands access is a defining cultural and economic issue, Hageman would be expected to fully address constituent concerns about proposals to sell millions of acres rather than dismissing them as 'misinformation.' Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: At the Greybull town hall, multiple constituents submitted written questions asking: 'Do you support the sale of our public land?' 'Will there be public input prior to listing land for sale?' 'Will you vote for the sale of public lands when it comes back to the House?' Hageman discarded the questions, claiming she had already addressed the issue, and characterized a Wilderness Society map showing potentially affected lands as 'misinformation.' The Wilderness Society stood by its depiction as consistent with the bill's text. Hageman had initially voted in favor of the public lands sale measure as part of H.R. 1 in committee. A letter to the Powell Tribune stated: 'Hageman blew off constituents' concerns.' Anonymous group Project Winchester formed specifically to oust Hageman over her public lands stance. Primary URL: https://powelltribune.com/stories/hageman-blew-off-constituents-concerns,10413
  • party committees
    Citizens United Political Victory Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: party committees
  • other candidates' committees
    Interested donors: Huck PAC
    Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
  • ideological & single-issue
    Value In Electing Women PAC, Black Hills Corporation PAC, Senate Conservatives Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Pinnacle West Capital Corporation PAC, J.R. Simplot Company Political Action Committee, Core Natural Resources/Core PAC, Calportland Company Political Action Committee (Cpcc-PAC) (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Buckeye Liberty PAC, Republican Majority Fund, Dirigo PAC, Heartland Values PAC, Arkansas For Leadership PAC (Arkpac), Common Values PAC, Eye Of The Tiger PAC, Leadership And Accountability Are National Keys PAC - Lank PAC, Reinventing A New Direction (Rand PAC), Tomorrow Is Meaningful PAC, Jobs Freedom And Security PAC, Nebraska Sandhills PAC, Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC, Boots PAC, True North PAC, Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans (Emmer PAC), Land Of Opportunity PAC, In The Arena PAC, Conservatives Harvesting Success PAC, Senate Eagle PAC, Fight On PAC, Steer PAC, Working For Ohio, Alabama First PAC, Building Up Democracy'S Dream, Pennsylvania Honor, Best At Bringing Entrepreneurial Results Never Imagined Or Envisioned PAC, Jobs Opportunity Now PAC, Raptor PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • other / unclassified
    Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association PAC, American Revival PAC (amounts: $7,500 (2026), $10,000 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
All silence flags for Harriet M. Hageman →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

25% of 8 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 2550 ↗ NAY 2025-12-11
    Protecting America's Workforce Act (restoring collective bargaining rights for federal workers)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Hageman voted against restoring collective bargaining rights for over one million federal workers. The AFL-CIO gave her a 0% 2025 score and 1% lifetime score. As Wyoming's representative in a state where federal land management agencies (BLM, USFS, NPS) are major employers, this vote went against the material interest of federal-worker constituents. All Republicans voting opposed the bill.
  • H.R. 4 YEA 2025-06-12
    Rescissions Act of 2025 ($9B in cuts: $1.1B from Corporation for Public Broadcasting, $7.9B from USAID foreign aid)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Hageman voted yea and told Star Valley constituents she had 'voted to disband and abolish USAID,' drawing whoops and cheers. The AFL-CIO opposed the bill as gutting foreign assistance and eliminating public broadcasting support. Wyoming's 30.6% bachelor's attainment and rural isolation make public broadcasting particularly valuable to constituents. Hageman's vote prioritized the Trump/DOGE-aligned austerity agenda over the informational and cultural needs of her rural constituency.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Hageman's official press release celebrated H.R. 1 as delivering for 'working families' and tax cuts 'for all Americans,' while the AFL-CIO assessed the bill would 'enact devastating cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other important social safety programs to provide tax-cuts to the rich.' Hageman's 0% AFL-CIO lifetime score reflects consistent opposition to labor's priorities. The Cody town hall coverage further noted the bill could increase taxes on the poorest Americans earning under $15,000. The two sources — Hageman's official House press release and the AFL-CIO legislative scorecard — come from independent outlets with different hostnames.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    At the same Cody town hall reported in a single article, Hageman claimed the bill would deliver 'the largest tax cut in history for all Americans,' while the same article noted the bill 'may also increase taxes on those earning less than $15,000 annually.' Both quotes come from the same secondary source (Wyoming News/Cody Enterprise). Hageman did not address this tension when questioned.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Hageman went from calling Trump 'racist and xenophobic' and 'the weakest candidate' while actively working to block his nomination at the 2016 GOP convention, to calling him 'the greatest president of my lifetime' and seeking his endorsement in 2022. Her stated explanation — that she 'heard and believed the lies' from Democrats and the media — does not reconcile with her active role as a Cruz delegate trying to force a floor vote against Trump. Both sources are from the same ABC News article via southernillinoisnow.com.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001096
CitationGoblin House. "Harriet M. Hageman — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-h001096.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.