SCORECARD · DAVID P. JOYCE accountability readout

David P. Joyce dossier →

Republican U.S. House · OH-14 full conduct profile →
85/100
CRITICAL CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
95
Contradiction risk25%
89
Connection density20%
83
Donor influence10%
82
Fact density10%
76
Constituency deviation5%
18
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 8

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Persistent avoidance of in-person town halls — no open town hall held over a 13-year congressional career, relying on brief telephone town halls that last approximately 30 minutes with a handful of pre-screened questions. 4476 days silent
    Expected position: As the representative for 785,281 constituents in northeast Ohio, Joyce would be expected to hold open, in-person town halls where constituents can engage in unscripted dialogue — especially during periods of major legislative action like the 2025 budget reconciliation process. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: In February 2017, about 150 people gathered in Painesville Square for a 'town hall' that Joyce did not attend, represented instead by a life-size cardboard cutout. The crowd chanted 'Where is Dave?' and held signs reading 'Do your job Rep. Joyce.' A 2018 constituent letter stated Joyce 'has never held a live Town Hall meeting in the six years he has been my representative.' In April 2025, constituents organized an in-person town hall in Geauga County after weeks of not hearing back from Joyce; nearly 400 people registered. Joyce did not attend. His office did not respond to a request for comment for the WVXU story. Instead, Joyce held a telephone town hall in March 2025, taking about half a dozen questions over approximately 30 minutes before a staffer stated the call's allotted time frame was ending. Primary URL: https://www.cleveland.com/metro/2017/02/district_14_town_hall_misses_r.html
  • Silence on whether voting for Social Security and Medicare cuts would affect his district's 60-69 year-old demographic — the largest age cohort at 14.7%. 99 days silent
    Expected position: As a congressman who told constituents on a telephone town hall that he would not approve Medicaid cuts and acknowledged cutting Medicaid would 'be the death of rural hospitals,' Joyce would be expected to explain his vote on legislation that independent analyses project would force deep cuts to those programs. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: On a March 26, 2025 telephone town hall, Joyce told constituents he 'would not approve' Medicaid cuts, acknowledged cutting Medicaid would 'be the death of rural hospitals,' and said Social Security would not be cut. He then voted for the House Budget Resolution (H.Con.Res.14) directing $880 billion in cuts — largely from Medicaid — and on May 22, 2025 voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which the CBO estimated would lead to millions losing Medicaid coverage. Joyce's office did not publicly address the contradiction beyond claiming the bill 'safeguards critical federal programs.' Primary URL: https://www.record-courier.com/story/news/local/2025/03/26/congressman-dave-joyce-hosts-telephone-town-hall-democrats-plan-in-person-event/82678693007/
  • ideological & single-issue
    No Labels PAC, Humane Society Legislative Fund PAC (amounts: $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Innovation PAC, Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC, Buckeye Liberty PAC, Conservative Opportunity Leadership & Enterprise PAC - Colepac, Upper Hand Fund, Building America'S Republican Representation PAC, Restoring Our Democracy (Rod PAC), Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans (Emmer PAC), In The Arena PAC, Jobs Opportunity Now PAC, Eye Of The Tiger PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Hallmark Cards, Inc. PAC (Hallpac), Eaton Corporation Public Policy Association, Keycorp Advocates Fund, Parker Hannifin Corp P. A. C., Materion Corporation Political Action Committee, Steris Employee PAC, The Geo Group, Inc. Political Action Committee, Peraton PAC, Osi Systems Inc PAC Osi PAC, Woolpert, Inc Political Action Committee, Canopy Growth Employees Political Forum PAC, Courier Plus, Inc. D/B/A Dutchie Political Action Committee (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $6,500 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,500 (2024), $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $7,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • party committees
    Republican Governance Group/Tuesday Group PAC, Funding Developing Leadership PAC (amounts: $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: party committees
  • other / unclassified
    Precision Machined Products Association, Kelley Drye & Warren PAC, Ice Miller PAC, National Confectioners Association Of The United States, Inc. Political Action Committee (, Cap-PAC Separate Segregated Fund Of The National Community Action Foundation Inc, National Assn Of Landscape Professionals PAC, American Revival PAC, Building Bridges PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $8,000 (2024), $6,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • other candidates' committees
    Interested donors: Huck PAC
    Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
All silence flags for David P. Joyce →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 4

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

40% of 10 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • One Big Beautiful Bill Act — $4.5 trillion reconciliation package with $880 billion in Medicaid and SNAP cuts, permanent extension of 2017 tax cuts, border security, and energy provisions
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Passed 218-214. The AFL-CIO gave Joyce a 1% score, noting the bill enacted 'devastating cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, and other important social safety programs to provide tax cuts to the rich.' His district has a poverty rate of 8.2% and relies heavily on rural hospitals that depend on Medicaid funding.
  • FY 2025 House Budget Resolution — Framework directing $880 billion in cuts from Energy and Commerce, targeting Medicaid and programs for the poor
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] On his telephone town hall exactly one month later, Joyce claimed the reconciliation bill 'contained no cuts' — but the resolution had directed $880 billion in mandatory savings from committees whose jurisdictions are overwhelmingly Medicaid. Joyce's vote set the stage for the BBB's deep cuts.
  • H.R. 5376 ↗ NAY 2022-08-12
    Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 — Medicare drug price negotiation, $35/month insulin cap for Medicare, clean energy tax credits, ACA premium subsidy extension
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Voted against allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices and capping insulin costs. Ohio has a higher-than-average rate of diabetes, and Joyce's district — median age 43 with the largest cohort being 60–69 — benefits directly from lower prescription drug costs.
  • H.R. 3684 ↗ NAY 2021-11-05
    Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act — $1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, broadband, water systems, and transit
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Joyce had five district projects worth $9.4 million in the bill but voted against it. A Cleveland.com letter writer asked whether Joyce would 'have the audacity to appear at any ceremonies' for the projects. Joyce later celebrated CDFI tax credits in Cleveland that relied on related federal funding.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 4

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Joyce voted against the bipartisan infrastructure law, then lobbied and celebrated $85 million in CDFI tax credit allocations for Cleveland — funding that relied on the very federal appropriations and infrastructure framework he opposed.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Joyce publicly told constituents he 'would not approve' Medicaid cuts and admitted they would 'be the death of rural hospitals,' then voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act which independent analyses confirm makes deep cuts to Medicaid — the program that keeps rural Ohio hospitals afloat in his own district.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Joyce voted against the AHCA in 2017 and presented himself as a moderate on healthcare, but had previously voted 31 times to fully repeal the ACA when those votes carried no political risk. The DCCC called his post-AHCA ad campaign a 'misleading ad reinventing his record.'
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    As GOP Co-Chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus who introduced pro-legalization legislation, Joyce voted against the MORE Act to federally decriminalize cannabis — a vote even Democratic caucus leaders dismissed as 'no reason for alarm,' but which marks a direct conflict between his leadership role and legislative action.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-j000295
CitationGoblin House. "David P. Joyce — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-j000295.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.