SCORECARD · BRIAN JACK accountability readout

Brian Jack dossier →

Republican U.S. House · GA-3 full conduct profile →
71/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
80
Donor influence10%
61
Fact density10%
48
Constituency deviation5%
26
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Brian Jack →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

11.1% of 9 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.J. Res. 20 ↗ YEA 2025-02-27
    Resolution to Repeal Biden-Era Tankless Water Heater Efficiency Regulation
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Jack led the bipartisan majority to pass this resolution, his first major legislative initiative affecting his district — protecting approximately 300 manufacturing jobs at Rinnai America Corporation in Spalding County. Passed 221-198 with 11 Democratic votes. Welcomed Energy Secretary Chris Wright to celebrate the repeal.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Jack campaigned in 2024 by attacking the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as budget-busting 'Green New Deal' spending that drove up prices for working families, yet voted in 2025 for the OBBB — which the CBO projected would add $2.4 trillion to deficits, vastly exceeding the IIJA's fiscal impact while still raising prices through tariffs and delivering most benefits to corporations and high-income earners.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Jack defended the Republican budget resolution on the House floor as a defense of 'blue-collar American workers,' yet the resolution cut $2 trillion from Medicaid, SNAP, and student loans — programs on which many blue-collar families in his district rely — while prioritizing $4.5 trillion in tax breaks heavily weighted toward corporations and the wealthy. His floor speech was immediately rebutted by the Democratic ranking member who noted the disconnect between Jack's rhetoric and the bill's substance.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-j000311
CitationGoblin House. "Brian Jack — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-j000311.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.