SCORECARD · MARK KELLY accountability readout

Mark Kelly dossier →

Democratic U.S. Senate · AZ full conduct profile →
60/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
31
Contradiction risk25%
87
Connection density20%
88
Donor influence10%
4
Fact density10%
73
Constituency deviation5%
41
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 4

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Escalating border crisis in Arizona (FY 2021-2023) while Kelly voted to defund border wall construction 515 days silent
    Expected position: As Arizona's senator representing a border state with 370 miles of U.S.-Mexico frontier, Kelly would be expected to actively address the record 1.7 million illegal border crossings in FY 2021 and their impact on Arizona communities. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During this period, Kelly voted on three separate occasions in 2021 to defund border wall construction (Feb 5, May 20, and Aug 4, 2021 amendments to prohibit canceling border wall contracts). The NRSC targeted him for 'ignoring the border crisis' and Arizona media noted he hadn't pressed Biden on the border. Kelly did not visit the border during this window. His pivot came only as the 2022 election approached: in his October 2022 debate, he called the border 'a mess' and said his party 'doesn't understand border issues,' later pushing the Biden administration to close 'gaps' in the Yuma border wall. His office was active on other issues including CHIPS Act negotiations and veterans' affairs during this same window. Primary URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nrsc-targets-democrats-border-states-arizona-nevada-new-ads
  • ideological & single-issue
    Interested donors: With Honor PAC
    With Honor PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • other / unclassified
    Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association PAC, Society For Cardiovascular Angiography And Interventions (Scai) PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Interested donors: Gridiron-PAC
    Gridiron-PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
All silence flags for Mark Kelly →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

14.3% of 7 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • S.Amdt. to S.Con.Res. ↗ NAY 2021-08-04
    Border Wall Funding Amendments (3 votes in 2021)
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Kelly voted three separate times in 2021 against amendments to prohibit canceling border wall contracts — in effect voting to defund wall construction. Arizona's border crosses 370 miles. By July 2022, facing a tough reelection in a border state, Kelly reversed course and pushed the Biden administration to close 'gaps' in the Yuma wall. The 2021 votes were used heavily against him in GOP advertising and became Exhibit A in the NRSC's case that Kelly was weak on border security.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 5

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Kelly voted three times in 2021 to defund border wall construction, then in 2022 campaigned on asking the Biden administration to close 'gaps' in the very same border wall in Yuma. A Tucson editorial captured the contradiction: 'Mark Kelly holds two opposing viewpoints at the same time.' The reversal spanned approximately 14 months and tracked with his reelection timeline in a border state.
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    Kelly's career arc from border-wall defunder (2021) to border-security campaigner (2022) to Laken Riley supporter and 70% GOP-alignment senator (2025) represents a sustained rightward pivot on immigration enforcement. Phoenix New Times documented how Kelly voted with Republicans on 7 of 10 key early-2025 issues, alarming progressive constituents who had backed him as a counterweight to Trumpism.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Kelly pledged to reject 'a dime of corporate PAC money' in 2019, yet gave paid speeches to Goldman Sachs and other corporate clients, attended a fundraiser hosted by a DC lobbying firm, and accepted hundreds of thousands from corporate CEOs and lobbyists. The Intercept noted the pledge applied narrowly to PAC contributions rather than individual corporate-affiliated donors — a distinction campaign finance watchdogs flagged as a creative workaround.
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    Kelly voted to expand ICE detention authority (Laken Riley Act, Jan 2025), then one year later declared he would vote against DHS's entire budget after ICE/Border Patrol shootings in Minneapolis. Kelly argued the two positions were consistent — he supports enforcement tools but not 'chaos' — but critics saw a contradiction between authorizing expanded detention and then defunding the agency carrying it out.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 30
    Kelly cheered the Artemis II launch as proof of American exceptionalism after voting against the OBBB that funded it with $9.9 billion. AZCIR fact-checked this as a 'mischaracterization' — Kelly supported NASA funding in negotiations but opposed the bill for its Medicaid/SNAP cuts. Both quotes come from direct sources: Kelly's own social media and his Senate voting record.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-k000377
CitationGoblin House. "Mark Kelly — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-k000377.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.