SCORECARD · BRAD KNOTT accountability readout

Brad Knott dossier →

Republican U.S. House · NC-13 full conduct profile →
62/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
72
Donor influence10%
38
Fact density10%
44
Constituency deviation5%
30
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • In-person town halls and direct constituent engagement 301 days silent
    Expected position: As a freshman congressman who campaigned on engaging directly with voters through 'door knocking and town hall meetings,' Knott would be expected to hold regular in-person town halls where constituents can ask unscripted questions. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Knott held mobile office hours in Johnston, Franklin, and Harnett counties and conducted telephone town halls where constituents had to pre-register and wait for an automated call. As of September 2025, he had held three such telephone events. When asked about in-person town halls, Knott opted for the controlled telephone format—even as other NC Republicans faced protestors at in-person events—raising concerns among constituents about accessibility and transparency. Primary URL: https://www.wunc.org/politics/2025-09-19/telephone-town-hall-nc-congressman-brad-knott-guns-immigration-health
  • Mass firings of federal workers by DOGE and their impact on veterans and VA healthcare in NC-13 45 days silent
    Expected position: As the representative of a district with approximately 50,000 veterans who rely on the Durham and Fayetteville VA Medical Centers, Knott would be expected to publicly address the Trump administration's mass firings of over 6,000 veteran federal workers and 2,500+ VA employees, and their impact on veteran healthcare access in his district. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During this period, Knott was actively posting on social media about immigration enforcement, holding mobile office hours, and issuing statements on border security and law enforcement. However, a constituent veteran advocate reported in the Cardinal & Pine on March 25, 2025 that he had called and emailed Knott's office repeatedly for weeks about the VA layoffs and received no response—not even a courtesy reply. Knott issued no public statement addressing the Durham and Fayetteville VA firings specifically. Primary URL: https://cardinalpine.com/opinion/op-ed-nc-13s-veterans-deserve-answers-from-congressman-brad-knott/
  • law & lobbying firms
    Honeywell International PAC, Federal Bipartisan Voluntary Public Affairs Committee Of The, American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC (amounts: $6,000 (2026), $11,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: law & lobbying firms
  • other / unclassified
    Kelley Drye & Warren PAC, American Revival PAC (amounts: $8,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Raptor PAC, Conservative Opportunity Leadership & Enterprise PAC - Colepac, Majority Committee PAC-Mc PAC, Eye Of The Tiger PAC, First In Freedom PAC, Innovation PAC, Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC, Together Holding Our Majority PAC, Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans (Emmer PAC), In The Arena PAC, Buckeye Liberty PAC, Building Up Democracy'S Dream, Duty Honor Victory PAC, Guarding Our Lasting Democracy, Thin Blue Line PAC, America'S Mountain PAC (amounts: $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $15,000 (2024), $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $8,500 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • other candidates' committees
    Huck PAC, George Holding For Congress Inc., Ted Budd For Senate, Vitoria PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $6,000 (2024), $6,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
All silence flags for Brad Knott →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 668 votes on file. 1 aligned, 7 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Knott signed a 'No New Taxes' pledge, yet voted for the OBBB which independent analysts projected would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit — effectively passing the cost to future taxpayers — while celebrating the bill as preventing 'draconian tax increases.'
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Knott touted infrastructure investment as a top priority and sits on the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, yet voted for the OBBB which repealed clean energy tax credits that supported infrastructure modernization for 89,000 North Carolina households — prioritizing tax cuts over the infrastructure investments he publicly championed.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Knott ran as a detail-oriented former prosecutor focused on public safety, yet voted against low-cost, evidence-based bills to improve battery safety and cleaner industrial materials that would reduce fires and pollution — outcomes that directly enhance community safety.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-k000405
CitationGoblin House. "Brad Knott — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-k000405.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.