SCORECARD · DORIS O. MATSUI accountability readout

Doris O. Matsui dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · CA-7 full conduct profile →
68/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
49
Donor influence10%
72
Fact density10%
82
Constituency deviation5%
11
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • In-person town hall meetings — constituent accessibility and direct accountability 1004 days silent
    Expected position: As a 10-term incumbent in a safely Democratic district (D+34), Matsui would be expected to hold regular, unscripted town hall meetings where constituents can ask live questions. This is considered a basic accountability practice for members of Congress, particularly during periods of heightened constituent concern about federal policy. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During this window, Matsui was active in Congress: she served as Ranking Member of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, co-authored the CHIPS Act, voted on major legislation, and attended community events such as the annual Tower Bridge Dinner and State of the Downtown Breakfast. However, she held no in-person town halls open to all constituents until October 2025. In March 2025, approximately 100 constituents protested at the west steps of the Capitol demanding more accessibility. When asked by the Sacramento Bee editorial board in June 2025 whether she would commit to town halls, Matsui gave evasive answers about civility and 'actual dialogue' without making a commitment. The one town hall she held in October 2025 was described as a 'moderated, controlled event' where she gave 'word salads' to direct questions. Primary URL: https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article311682276.html
  • Gaza humanitarian crisis — constituent demands for accountability on U.S. military aid to Israel 735 days silent
    Expected position: As a Democrat representing a district where 75% of Democratic voters oppose additional military aid to Israel (per August 2025 Quinnipiac poll), and where 77% of Democrats believe Israel is committing genocide, Matsui would be expected to hold public meetings, issue detailed statements, or host town halls explaining her position on arms transfers to Israel. The Sacramento chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility had regularly met with her office for 20 years on various issues. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During this two-year window, Matsui was publicly active on many fronts: she issued statements on antisemitism, voted on Israel-related resolutions, co-sponsored the CHIPS Act, secured funding for Sacramento clean-energy projects, spoke at the Tower Bridge Dinner, and engaged with business leaders. However, Sacramento doctors reported that despite multiple meeting requests, a January 2024 letter signed by 96 healthcare workers, and repeated emails and letters from constituents, Matsui has not met with any civil rights or human rights advocacy groups to discuss Gaza. Her staff told constituents they 'could not' speak on behalf of the congresswoman on the issue and directed them to check her website. Primary URL: https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article312436221.html
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Southern California Fund, Doing Right - Results Action Unity Leadership PAC, Fair Shot PAC, Visionary PAC, Jobs, Education, & Families First Jeff PAC, Victory In November Election PAC (Vinepa, Frontline USA, Oceans PAC, Hms Scrap PAC, Innovation For Good PAC, PAC To The Future, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • other / unclassified
    Nat Assoc Of Chain Drug Stores Inc PAC (Nacds PAC), National Association For Behavioral Healthcare Champions PAC, American Osteopathic Information Association, Healthcare Distribution Alliance Political Action Committee, Kelley Drye & Warren PAC, Faegre Drinker Political Action Committee (Faegre Drinker Pa, Competitive Carriers Association PAC, Supporting House Problem Solvers - Shp PAC, Onward Together Committee, Elect Dems Now PAC, Democrats Win Fund (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2024), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $8,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Siemens Corporation PAC, Vmware, Inc. Political Action Committee (Vmware PAC), Vsp Holding Company Inc Political Action Committee, Aes Corporation Political Action Committee; The, Novocure Inc. PAC (A.K.A. Novocure PAC), Ericsson Inc. U.S. Employees Political Action Committee ('Ericsson PAC'), Dropbox Inc PAC, Tenable, Inc. Political Action Committee (Tenable PAC), Neology Inc Employee Political Action Committee (Neopac), United States Cellular Corporation PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $7,500 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $6,600 (2024), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • ideological & single-issue
    Interested donors: Elect Democratic Women
    Elect Democratic Women (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
All silence flags for Doris O. Matsui →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

25% of 4 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 4367 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2023-09-28
    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2024 (Motion to Recommit)
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Matsui voted to advance the DHS appropriations bill that funded Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. This vote stands in stark contrast to her February 2026 declaration of 'Hell No' to ICE funding, as she campaigned against an opponent (Mai Vang) who advocates abolishing ICE. The reversal on ICE funding — from supporter to outspoken opponent — tracks with the escalating progressive primary challenge she faces.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Matsui publicly declared 'Hell No' to ICE funding in February 2026, yet her voting record shows she supported DHS and ICE funding at least five times previously, including as recently as September 2023. This reversal comes as she faces a primary challenge from a progressive opponent who has made abolishing ICE a central campaign pledge. The two source hosts differ (sacramentostandard.com vs. migrantinsider.com), satisfying the independent-outlet requirement.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Matsui's platform emphasizes healthcare access and affordability, yet when directly asked at a public town hall whether she would support Medicare for All (H.R. 3069), she refused to give a yes-or-no answer, instead delivering what the Sacramento Bee described as a 'word salad.' Both quotes come from different articles (sacbee.com vs. matsui.house.gov), satisfying the independent-outlet requirement.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001163
CitationGoblin House. "Doris O. Matsui — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001163.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.