SCORECARD · GRACE MENG accountability readout

Grace Meng dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · NY-6 full conduct profile →
64/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
41
Donor influence10%
48
Fact density10%
88
Constituency deviation5%
36
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Meng has refused in-person town halls, holding only tightly controlled virtual meetings and telephone townhalls 1216 days silent
    Expected position: As the elected representative of 733,304 Queens constituents since 2013, Meng would be expected to hold regular open, in-person town halls accessible to all voters, particularly given her district's diverse immigrant and working-class population. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Queens 6th District Ceasefire Coalition members reported that Meng 'turned down their requests for an in-person meeting' and only after persistent efforts spanning several months did they secure a virtual Zoom call in January 2024. Challenger Chuck Park described Meng in November 2025 as 'an absentee representative who has gone missing when New Yorkers need her most.' Meng has been highly active on other fronts during this period: she held a Medicaid Day of Action press conference (March 2025), conducted a Social Security listening session (May 2025), held a free fishing clinic (October 2025), and issued dozens of press releases on legislation and constituent services — proving active public communication through controlled formats rather than open public forums. Primary URL: https://queenseagle.com/all/2025/11/17/queens-government-worker-to-challenge-meng
  • Meng refused to call for Gaza ceasefire despite 80% constituent support during fall 2023 through January 2024, telling peace advocates 'we'll try harder to express sympathy' 103 days silent
    Expected position: As representative of a majority-minority district where constituents delivered a 1,000-signature petition and held weekly office vigils for a ceasefire, Meng would be expected to respond substantively to the humanitarian crisis rather than offering only sympathy. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Meng was active on Israel-Palestine issues during this period: she delivered remarks at a Kew Gardens vigil mourning October 7 victims (October 2023), met with hostage families (November 2023), co-sponsored H.Res. 793 calling on Hamas to release hostages, and signed a letter to Secretary Blinken opposing a 'one-sided ceasefire.' She held a virtual Zoom with the ceasefire coalition on January 12, 2024 only after months of refusing in-person meetings. Advocates reported feeling 'silenced and dismissed.' Meng's core policy position — refusal to endorse a ceasefire — remained unchanged, while her top donor AIPAC contributed $85,250. Primary URL: https://qns.com/2024/01/congresswoman-meng-backlash-gaza-ceasefire-stance/
  • ideological & single-issue
    Tri-State Maxed-Out Women, Elect Democratic Women, Defend The Vote, Asian American Political Action Committee - Aapac (amounts: $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $7,500 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    PAC To The Future, Off The Sidelines PAC, Fair Shot PAC, Common Good PAC, Chinese American Leadership PAC, AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,500 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • other / unclassified
    Aspire PAC, The Next 50 PAC, Uca Political Action Committee, Rebuild America PAC (amounts: $9,500 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $8,300 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • party committees
    Chinese American Leadership PAC (amounts: $6,500 (2024)) — interest area: party committees
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Peraton PAC, Nomura Holding America Inc. PAC, Aar Corp. PAC (amounts: $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
All silence flags for Grace Meng →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1877 votes on file. 4 aligned, 0 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Meng denied AIPAC contributions influence her policy stance on Israel-Gaza, yet AIPAC is her top career donor by a factor of 6x ($500,598 vs. $72,149 for second place) and gave $85,250 in the 2023-2024 cycle — more than 11x the next-largest contributor. The scale of the funding disparity, combined with Meng's consistent pro-Israel positioning against the expressed will of 80% of her constituents, makes the denial of influence newsworthy. Both sources are independent: Meng's statement is from a QNS news article; the contribution data is from OpenSecrets.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Meng frames her pro-Israel stance as representing her district's Jewish American population, yet constituents across faiths — including Jewish Voice for Peace members — organized against her position with a 1,000-signature petition and cited polling showing 80% district support for a ceasefire. Meng declined in-person meetings for months. Her framing of constituent interest selectively emphasizes one demographic while the documented organized opposition comes from a multi-faith coalition including Jewish, Muslim, Christian, and Asian American constituents.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001188
CitationGoblin House. "Grace Meng — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001188.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.