SCORECARD · MARIANNETTE MILLER-MEEKS accountability readout

Mariannette Miller-Meeks dossier →

Republican U.S. House · IA-1 full conduct profile →
70/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
99
Contradiction risk25%
69
Connection density20%
0
Donor influence10%
97
Fact density10%
97
Constituency deviation5%
51
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 9

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Mariannette Miller-Meeks →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

28.6% of 7 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 1 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (119th Congress)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Miller-Meeks voted for legislation that CBO projected would cut $1 trillion from Medicaid and SNAP, with 7.5 million projected to lose Medicaid by 2034. IA-01 has significant rural Medicaid enrollment and documented rural hospital financial stress; several rural Iowa hospitals operate near financial thresholds where Medicaid cuts trigger closure risk. Her vote crossed her stated platform as a rural physician committed to healthcare access and contradicts her public identity — but aligned with healthcare industry donors who benefit from market-based alternatives to Medicaid expansion.
  • H.R. 5376 ↗ NAY_UNVERIFIED 2022-08-12
    Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Miller-Meeks voted against the IRA, which included substantial renewable energy tax credits relevant to Iowa's wind energy industry — Iowa generates approximately 60% of its electricity from wind and is the second-largest wind energy producer in the United States. Her nay aligned with her party but crossed the material economic interest of a significant constituent industry. Wind energy companies and rural landowners receiving turbine lease payments in IA-01 had a direct financial interest in the IRA's Production Tax Credit extension.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Miller-Meeks's stated platform of healthcare access for rural Iowans — grounded in her identity as a rural physician — sits in direct tension with her vote for the OBBBA, which the CBO projected would cause 7.5 million Americans to lose Medicaid coverage, with rural and lower-income populations disproportionately represented among those affected given Iowa's rural Medicaid enrollment patterns.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Miller-Meeks voted to certify the 2020 election results — explicitly upholding the constitutional process — then voted against creating the investigative committee designed to document the attack that preceded that certification vote, creating a documented tension between her stated commitment to constitutional process and her opposition to the oversight mechanism for that process.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001215
CitationGoblin House. "Mariannette Miller-Meeks — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-m001215.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.