SCORECARD · JIMMY PANETTA accountability readout

Jimmy Panetta dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · CA-19 full conduct profile →
77/100
HIGH CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
49
Donor influence10%
89
Fact density10%
94
Constituency deviation5%
50
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Jimmy Panetta →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

25% of 4 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R.9495 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2024-11-21
    Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act — 'Nonprofit Killer' bill allowing Treasury to revoke tax-exempt status of nonprofits designated as 'terrorist supporting'
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Panetta was one of only 15 Democrats to vote YES on final passage after civil liberties groups and local activists lobbied hard. The bill allows the Treasury Secretary to unilaterally revoke nonprofit tax-exempt status with minimal due process. His district is home to progressive nonprofits and advocacy groups that opposed the bill. PG Progressives cited this as the vote that 'prompted many of us to watch his 2025 record much more closely.'
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Panetta's signature anti-corruption pledge to reject corporate PAC money is contradicted by his acceptance of $1,368,471 in PAC contributions (52.31% of his 2024 cycle fundraising), including from major defense contractors and industry PACs. His campaign's defense rests on a definitional distinction between 'corporate PACs' and 'trade association PACs' that FEC rules do not formally recognize — defense contractor PACs like those from General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin are legally indistinguishable from other corporate PACs.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Both quotes come from the same secondary source (PG Progressives wrap-up). Panetta's votes to override D.C. home rule are presented alongside the observation that his solidly Democratic district expects progressive leadership — creating a tension between his voting record and his constituents' expectations as documented by local progressive advocates.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Both quotes come from the same secondary source (the Green Party/reporting on AIPAC contributions). Panetta claimed at a town hall that he is not influenced by AIPAC donations, yet he received a record $143,055 from AIPAC on December 31, 2023, and three weeks later signed a letter attacking the ICJ genocide case against Israel. The timing raises questions about influence, though the causal link is not directly evidenced.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-p000613
CitationGoblin House. "Jimmy Panetta — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-p000613.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.