SCORECARD · JIMMY PATRONIS accountability readout

Jimmy Patronis dossier →

Republican U.S. House · FL-1 full conduct profile →
65/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
80
Connection density20%
80
Donor influence10%
29
Fact density10%
40
Constituency deviation5%
13
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Jimmy Patronis →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 582 votes on file. 1 aligned, 3 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 4

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Patronis campaigned as a fighter for homeowners and the insurance regulator, yet his Department of Financial Services referred only 5% of 52,160 consumer complaints for action, stalled document releases, and took nearly half his campaign funds from the insurance industry — a structural conflict between his regulatory duties and his political financing.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Patronis defended OBBBA's Medicaid reductions by asserting hospitals must treat all patients regardless of insurance — a claim that is true only for emergency stabilization under EMTALA, not for ongoing treatment, prescriptions, or primary care. His office declined to clarify this or other policy positions when pressed by a local news outlet.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Patronis's campaign ad touted 'the largest fine in history against an insurance company' as evidence he fights for homeowners, but his office was actually dismissive of the fine when it was issued, saying the money should go to rate relief instead. Both quotes come from the same secondary source (Tampa Bay Times/Sun-Sentinel), so editors may downgrade visibility.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Patronis raged against BlackRock on social media and divested $2 billion in state funds, calling ESG investing 'woke' and comparing the CEO to a 'Bond villain.' Yet he personally held over $75,000 in a BlackRock-managed fund in his own retirement account — a direct contradiction between his public political crusade and his private financial behavior.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-p000622
CitationGoblin House. "Jimmy Patronis — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-p000622.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.