SCORECARD · DAVID SCHWEIKERT accountability readout

David Schweikert dossier →

Republican U.S. House · AZ-1 full conduct profile →
70/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
91
Connection density20%
49
Donor influence10%
70
Fact density10%
39
Constituency deviation5%
18
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for David Schweikert →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 1879 votes on file. 0 aligned, 0 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Schweikert voted against the bipartisan infrastructure law, then was identified as among the Republican lawmakers who touted and took credit for infrastructure projects funded by the very legislation they opposed. President Biden specifically called out this category of behavior.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Schweikert voted against the PACT Act twice, then urged veterans to enroll in its benefits through his official newsletter and social media without mentioning his votes against the bill. Business Insider and Yahoo News both catalogued this as a 'particularly egregious example of scummy two-faced behavior.'
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Schweikert built his political identity as a deficit hawk, giving countless floor speeches warning about the national debt, yet he helped negotiate and would have voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that the CBO projected would add trillions to the deficit. NBC News called him out for 'facing blowback,' and the DCCC labeled him a 'fake deficit hawk.'
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001183
CitationGoblin House. "David Schweikert — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001183.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.