SCORECARD · DARREN SOTO accountability readout

Darren Soto dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · FL-9 full conduct profile →
70/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
95
Contradiction risk25%
58
Connection density20%
56
Donor influence10%
84
Fact density10%
67
Constituency deviation5%
35
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 8

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Darren Soto →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

20% of 10 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 7900 ↗ NAY 2025-09-30
    Continuing Resolution / Government Funding (September 2025) — GOP-led short-term funding measure to avert a federal shutdown
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Soto voted against the GOP CR, which the NRCC called 'voting to shut down the government.' Democrats argued the measure failed to address broader needs including hurricane recovery — critical for Florida's 9th District which is prone to flooding and storms.
  • Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act — Requires documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Soto voted against the SAVE Act, aligning with Democratic leadership who characterized it as voter suppression. The NRCC used this vote against him, noting he later voted to prohibit non-citizen voting in DC — a contradiction they called a 'flip-flop.'
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Soto's progressive environmental branding and 98% LCV score contrast with his top-donor relationship with AIPAC and his vote to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib — the only Palestinian-American member of Congress — a vote that drew organized protests at his district office.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Soto voted against the final budget citing ICE funding concerns, then took credit for $13.4 million in community project funding that was in the same budget — a contradiction the NRCC has seized on in ads targeting his reelection.
  • reversal SCORE 60
    Soto voted against the SAVE Act requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration in April 2025, then voted to prohibit non-citizen voting in Washington D.C. two months later. The NRCC characterized this as a 'flip-flop' under political pressure in his competitive district.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001200
CitationGoblin House. "Darren Soto — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001200.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.