SCORECARD · ANDREA SALINAS accountability readout

Andrea Salinas dossier →

Democratic U.S. House · OR-6 full conduct profile →
60/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
48
Connection density20%
68
Donor influence10%
72
Fact density10%
51
Constituency deviation5%
49
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Andrea Salinas →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 1

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

16.7% of 6 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 4 ↗ YEA 2025-07-17
    Rescissions Act of 2025
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Salinas voted to cut foreign assistance and public broadcasting funding, a reversal of her usual support for international aid.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Salinas's strong support for Israel's self-defense in October 2023 contrasts with her vote for massive military aid to Ukraine in April 2024, potentially reflecting a prioritization of European security over Middle Eastern concerns, or a shift in foreign policy focus.
  • statement_vs_vote SCORE 30
    Salinas advocates for campaign finance transparency but voted to ban TikTok, a platform used for political expression and campaigning, creating a tension between transparency advocacy and free speech restrictions.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001226
CitationGoblin House. "Andrea Salinas — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 19, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/congress-s001226.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.