SCORECARD · CYNTHIA LUMMIS in office since 2021-01-03

Cynthia Lummis dossier →

Republican U.S. Senate · WY full conduct profile →
85/100
CRITICAL CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
95
Connection density20%
91
Donor influence10%
63
Fact density10%
86
Constituency deviation5%
11
Voting misalignment5%
1

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Cynthia Lummis →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

20% of 10 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R. 3684 (117th Congress) ↗ NAY 2021-08-10
    Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act — $1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, broadband, and water systems
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Lummis opposed the bipartisan infrastructure law. Wyoming's infrastructure needs are significant given its vast rural geography and 18.8-minute average commute time with 79.5% of workers driving alone. The state received substantial broadband and highway funding from this bill.
  • Electoral College Certification (2021) ↗ YEA 2021-01-06
    Certification of 2020 presidential election results — Objection to Pennsylvania's electoral votes
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Lummis' first vote as senator was a 'flip-flop on a flip-flop': she voted to certify Arizona but objected to Pennsylvania. The vote came hours after the Capitol was breached. Wyoming's other delegation members (Barrasso and Cheney) had declined to back Trump's efforts, calling them unconstitutional.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 4

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 90
    Lummis champions Bitcoin legislation that could directly enrich her personally. MSNBC's Chris Hayes warned the BITCOIN Act could transfer $100 billion from taxpayers to Bitcoin owners — a group that includes Lummis, who first bought Bitcoin at $330 and has held the asset while writing laws that boost its price.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Lummis broke from her long-standing opposition to same-sex marriage by voting for the Respect for Marriage Act, becoming one of only 12 Senate Republicans to support it. The Wyoming GOP passed a formal resolution condemning her vote, and multiple county-level censure attempts followed. She justified the reversal as an act of 'tolerating' others' views.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Lummis pledged to respect the Electoral College results in December 2020, but weeks later joined senators pledging to object, then voted to object to Pennsylvania's certification on January 6, 2021. The Casper Star-Tribune called her first Senate vote 'a flip-flop on a flip-flop.' Republican Accountability gave her an 'F' democracy score.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Lummis voted against the bipartisan infrastructure bill and foreign aid packages citing fiscal concerns, yet she championed the One Big Beautiful Bill which independent analyses projected would add trillions to the deficit. She also pushed a failed Bitcoin tax exemption amendment to that same bill.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/cynthia-lummis
CitationGoblin House. "Cynthia Lummis — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 16, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/cynthia-lummis.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.