SCORECARD · JODEY ARRINGTON in office since 2025-01-03

Jodey Arrington dossier →

Republican U.S. House · TX-19 full conduct profile →
71/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
22
Donor influence10%
82
Fact density10%
98
Constituency deviation5%
64
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

  • Fiscal commission as vehicle for Social Security and Medicare cuts 431 days silent
    Expected position: Arrington has championed a bipartisan fiscal commission to address the national debt, which critics call a 'death panel' for Social Security and Medicare. Given his 2016 comment that it takes 'courage' to cut Social Security and his district's median age of 33.7 — meaning younger workers are paying into programs whose benefits Arrington has endorsed cutting — constituents would expect clarity on his position. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Arrington held multiple Budget Committee hearings on creating a fiscal commission in this period and was quoted by the Free Library endorsing an increase in the Medicare and Social Security eligibility age. During a March 2024 Budget Committee markup, Democrats proposed amendments to protect Social Security and Medicare; every Republican voted them down. Arrington has not directly addressed the 'death panel' characterization or explained how raising the eligibility age serves his working-class constituents. Primary URL: https://radiofree.asia/2024/03/07/republicans-vote-to-advance-budget-with-trump-arrington-death-panel-for-social-security/
  • Impact of OBBBA Medicaid and SNAP cuts on TX-19 constituents 78 days silent
    Expected position: As author of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and a representative of a district with 16% poverty and tens of thousands of Medicaid and SNAP beneficiaries, Arrington would be expected to explain how deep cuts to these programs are consistent with constituent well-being. Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: Arrington was heavily active in this period — introducing H.R. 1 on May 20, 2025, participating in an RSC fireside chat with August Pfluger on August 6, 2025 touting the bill as 'a WIN for West Texas,' and issuing multiple statements on fiscal responsibility. Yet he never publicly addressed the CBO estimate that millions would lose health coverage, the Meals on Wheels director's warning that the cuts would 'deeply affect them,' or how his constituents would fare under the tightened SNAP work requirements. He framed the bill exclusively in terms of tax relief and fiscal discipline. Primary URL: https://rsc-pfluger.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx?ID=XBQV67H67RH6RJZBHZB3K5TIZA
  • colleagues' leadership pacs
    Making America Prosperous PAC, Gridiron-PAC, Mr. Southern Missourian In The House PAC, Building America'S Republican Representation PAC, In The Arena PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
  • other / unclassified
    United Postmasters And Managers Of America Political Fund, Bracepac (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other / unclassified
  • law & lobbying firms
    American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC, Honeywell International PAC, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Civic Action Committee (amounts: $10,000 (2024), $7,500 (2024), $5,500 (2024)) — interest area: law & lobbying firms
  • corporate pacs, industry unlisted
    Interested donors: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC PAC
    Pernod Ricard USA, LLC PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
  • other candidates' committees
    Friends Of Community Oncology PAC, Huck PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: other candidates' committees
All silence flags for Jodey Arrington →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 3

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

37.5% of 8 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • H.R.1 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2025-07-03
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act — Trump tax cuts and spending reconciliation with estimated $880 billion in Medicaid cuts
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Arrington authored and floor-managed H.R. 1, the largest budget reconciliation bill in U.S. history. The CBO projected it would add $3.4 trillion to deficits and cause millions to lose health coverage through Medicaid work requirements and spending reductions. TX-19 has a 16% poverty rate and healthcare as a dominant industry. Arrington was the legislation's primary architect — the single most consequential vote of his career.
  • H.R.2811 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2023-04-26
    Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — debt ceiling package with $144 billion in domestic spending cuts
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Arrington authored this bill that the AFL-CIO warned would slash domestic spending by up to 22%, jeopardizing Medicaid for 10 million low-income Americans and cutting food assistance for millions. The bill imposed work requirements on safety-net programs serving his own high-poverty district (16%). It passed 217-215, making Arrington's authorship pivotal.
  • H.R.1628 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2017-05-04
    American Health Care Act — ACA repeal and replacement
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Arrington voted for the AHCA, which the CBO estimated would leave 24 million more Americans uninsured. A local Democratic response noted the vote 'eliminated healthcare for 18,000+ people in his district.' TX-19 has a 16% poverty rate and an estimated uninsured rate above 11%, making healthcare coverage a critical constituent concern.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Arrington built his pre-congressional career as a healthcare executive who championed rural healthcare access, yet authored and voted for the two largest pieces of legislation imposing Medicaid cuts in a generation — the Limit, Save, Grow Act (2023) and OBBBA (2025). The AFL-CIO scorecard documents that his votes would cut funding for services low-income working families depend on.
  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
    Arrington co-chairs the Rural Health Care Task Force and advocates for rural hospital Medicare reimbursement, yet the Abilene Meals on Wheels director stated his proposed budget would cut Medicaid, SNAP, and social services block grants. Rural hospitals in TX-19 depend heavily on Medicaid reimbursements, and the cuts Arrington champions threaten the same providers he claims to support.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Both quotes come from the same secondary source (Arrington's official house.gov page). He claims to fight for affordable care while simultaneously telling Politico he wants to pursue additional Medicaid spending reductions beyond those already enacted in OBBBA. The Politico article is a separate outlet documenting the contradiction in his public record.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/jodey-arrington
CitationGoblin House. "Jodey Arrington — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 16, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/jodey-arrington.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.