SCORECARD · KATIE BRITT in office since 2023-01-03

Katie Britt dossier →

Republican U.S. Senate · AL full conduct profile →
74/100
HIGH CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
85
Contradiction risk25%
76
Connection density20%
85
Donor influence10%
55
Fact density10%
71
Constituency deviation5%
33
Voting misalignment5%
2

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 7

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Katie Britt →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 5

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

62.5% of 8 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • S.Amdt. 512 ↗ NAY 2025-11-11
    ACA Enhanced Subsidy Extension — November 2025
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Britt expressed skepticism about renewing Affordable Care Act subsidies and voted against a one-year extension. Alabama has one of the highest uninsured rates in the nation and 15.6% poverty — meaning enhanced ACA subsidies have disproportionate impact on her constituents. Speaking to the Montgomery Chamber of Commerce, Britt suggested the one-year extension 'would not be sufficient,' yet offered no alternative for Alabamians who would lose coverage if subsidies expired.
  • H.R. 1 ↗ YEA 2025-07-01
    One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — Senate passage
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Britt voted yea on legislation the CBO projected would add $3.3 trillion to deficits and cut approximately $1.2 trillion from Medicaid. Alabama has a 15.6% poverty rate, approximately 1 million residents on Medicaid, and 726,000 on SNAP. Britt defended the bill on CNN's State of the Union, claiming cuts 'absolutely' would not affect Alabamians who truly need services. Only 3 Senate Republicans voted nay (Collins, Murkowski, McConnell). The bill passed 51-50 with VP Vance breaking the tie. Alabama clergy later led protests at her office demanding restoration of Medicaid and SNAP funding, and columnist Kyle Whitmire noted Britt 'didn't flinch' while 'Robinhood, only backwards' legislation passed.
  • H.Con.Res. 14 ↗ YEA 2025-02-21
    FY2025 Budget Resolution (Reconciliation Framework)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Britt voted yea on the budget resolution that set the framework for the OBBBA reconciliation, requiring $1.5 trillion in mandatory savings. The CWA opposed the resolution, stating it 'threatens the financial security and well-being of millions of American workers by prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy.' Britt's vote was party-line. The resolution enabled the $1.2 trillion in Medicaid and SNAP cuts that she would later defend on CNN as not affecting 'truly needy' Alabamians.
  • S. 1999 ↗ NAY 2024-06-05
    Right to Contraception Act (cloture vote)
    why contradicted?
    [against_constituent] Britt opposed cloture on the Right to Contraception Act, joining all Senate Republicans in blocking the measure. She gave a Senate floor speech accusing Democrats of 'false fearmongering' and 'scare tactics,' claiming the right to contraception is not at risk. The vote came at a time when Justice Thomas had explicitly called for reconsidering the Griswold precedent and an Alabama Democrat had just flipped a state House seat by campaigning on reproductive rights — including contraception access — in the wake of Alabama's near-total abortion ban. Britt signed a GOP statement falsely claiming the bill would give 'condoms to little kids.'
  • H.R. 815 ↗ YEA 2024-04-23
    National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan)
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Britt was one of only 8-10 Republican senators who flipped from voting nay on the February 2024 version to voting yea on the April 2024 version, supplying decisive support for the $95 billion foreign aid package that passed 79-18. Her Alabama colleague Tommy Tuberville voted nay in February and did not vote in April. The reversal placed her in the Reaganite internationalist wing of the GOP on this specific vote, distinguishing her from the isolationist flank. She subsequently voted to block Ukraine debt redistribution in November 2024, placing her position in ongoing tension.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 3

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • platform_vs_vote SCORE 90
    Britt campaigns as a champion of 'hardworking families' and working-class Alabamians, yet voted for legislation the CBO projected would cut $1.2 trillion from Medicaid — a program covering approximately 1 million Alabamians — and $230 billion from SNAP, on which 726,000 Alabamians rely. The AFL-CIO gave her a 0% lifetime score. She defended the bill on CNN's State of the Union by claiming cuts would 'absolutely' not hurt the truly needy.
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Britt's 2024 SOTU rebuttal featured a widely fact-checked story implying a sex trafficking victim's experience occurred under Biden's border policies, when the victim herself stated it happened in Mexico during the Bush administration (2004-2008). Britt later defended the misleading framing, exemplifying a pattern of using emotionally charged personal narratives in service of policy positions that independent fact-checkers found deceptive.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Britt co-sponsored IVF protection legislation positioning herself as a defender of reproductive healthcare access, yet opposed the Right to Contraception Act — calling it 'stunt legislation' — while claiming contraception access is 'not at risk.' Critics noted the inconsistency between protecting IVF (a fertility treatment) while opposing federal protections for contraception access, given that both involve reproductive autonomy.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/katie-britt
CitationGoblin House. "Katie Britt — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 16, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/katie-britt.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.