SCORECARD · KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND in office since 2009

Kirsten Gillibrand dossier →

Democratic U.S. Senate · NY-NY Statewide full conduct profile →
85/100
CRITICAL CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
97
Connection density20%
96
Donor influence10%
59
Fact density10%
97
Constituency deviation5%
37
Voting misalignment5%
1

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Kirsten Gillibrand →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 2

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

15.4% of 13 rated votes contradicted the stated platform
  • S. 2938 ↗ YEA_UNVERIFIED 2022-06-23
    Bipartisan Safer Communities Act — On Passage
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] Gillibrand voted for the most significant federal gun safety legislation in nearly 30 years, including enhanced background checks and anti-trafficking provisions. This vote crystallized her decade-long evolution from a pro-gun House member with an NRA endorsement to a Senate gun-control advocate, representing the same population (New York State) that had shifted politically.
  • H.R. 1424 (110th) ↗ NAY 2008-10-03
    Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (TARP) — House final passage
    why contradicted?
    [reversal] As a freshman Blue Dog representing the upstate NY-20 district, Gillibrand voted against the financial-sector bailout — a defining Blue Dog vote that contrasts sharply with her later Senate-era posture as a New York statewide Democrat representing the country's largest financial-services concentration.
Full voting record + platform comparison →
03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 5

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • reversal SCORE 90
    Gillibrand built her national brand as the Democrat with the highest rate of opposing Trump nominees in 2017, yet in 2025 she confirmed more Trump cabinet picks in three months than she had in Trump's entire first term — including Treasury Secretary, Transportation Secretary, and Interior Secretary. The Revolving Door Project called this a trade of 'resistance for capitulation,' questioning whether her DSCC Chair role has recalibrated her toward accommodating the Trump administration.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Gillibrand moved from praising the NRA and opposing gun restrictions in 2008 as an upstate New York Representative to calling the NRA 'the worst organization in this country' and advocating sweeping gun control as a statewide Senator and presidential candidate in 2019. The reversal tracks with her shift from a conservative rural district to a Democratic-leaning statewide constituency.
  • reversal SCORE 90
    Gillibrand's posture on firearms regulation reversed within months of her January 2009 appointment to the Senate — from cosponsoring a bill that would have stripped D.C. of authority to regulate handguns and pre-empted future local gun legislation, to championing federal handgun-trafficking legislation, an assault-weapons ban, and high-capacity-magazine restrictions. Gillibrand has herself acknowledged the reversal on the record, telling CNN in March 2019, 'I didn't do the right thing… I should have cared more about gun violence in other parts of my state or other parts of my country, I just didn't.'
  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Gillibrand positions herself as a champion of working families while co-sponsoring a crypto deregulation bill that received $217,000 from crypto industry donors including firms that critics say the GENIUS Act gives competitive advantages over traditional banks. Elizabeth Warren-aligned scholars characterized the bill as a 'giveaway' to the very industry funding her campaign.
  • same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
    Gillibrand opposed the bipartisan shutdown-ending funding deal while simultaneously claiming credit for millions in community project funding that it contained. The Daily Caller reported she voted against the legislation while her office touted the earmarks it delivered — a pattern shared with other New York Democrats. Both accounts come from publicly reported sources.
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/kirsten-gillibrand
CitationGoblin House. "Kirsten Gillibrand — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 17, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/kirsten-gillibrand.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.