SCORECARD · MARK WARNER in office since 2021-01-03

Mark Warner dossier →

Democratic U.S. Senate · VA full conduct profile →
68/100
ELEVATED CAPTURE-RISK INDEX
How this number is built ↓
Silence risk25%
69
Contradiction risk25%
48
Connection density20%
93
Donor influence10%
95
Fact density10%
36
Constituency deviation5%
11
Voting misalignment5%
0

Weighted composite, 0–100. Identical to the figure on the Congress monitor. Each bar is the component's normalised 0–100 contribution before weighting.

01

Silence on donor-funded topics 6

Topics where donors have documented interests but the official has no public statement on record. Silence is the absence of expected speech — not proof of intent.

All silence flags for Mark Warner →
02

Vote-vs-platform contradictions 0

Roll-call votes that contradict the official's own stated platform commitments. Each links to the bill and the contradiction rationale.

No platform-contradicting votes among 432 votes on file. 1 aligned, 2 related.

03

Broken promises 0

Documented public commitments paired with the documented action that broke them. Each carries a primary-source citation for the violation.

No documented broken promises on file.

04

Documented contradictions 2

Stated-position-vs-revealed-conduct contradictions analysed against the official's commitments, scored by strength of the contradiction.

  • statement_vs_disclosure SCORE 60
    Warner presents himself as a reformer pushing for tech accountability and privacy guardrails, yet his personal financial portfolio contains $98.6 million in diversified ETF holdings including broad market funds that would benefit from less restrictive tech regulation. His venture capital background at Columbia Capital invested in telecom and tech companies - sectors he now regulates as Intelligence Committee Chair
  • position_evolution SCORE 60
    Warner publicly expressed strong concerns about privacy and government data collection when it involved a foreign adversary (TikTok/China), yet simultaneously pushed for reauthorization of warrantless surveillance powers under FISA Section 702 that allow the US government to collect and query communications without individual warrants - creating a contradiction between his stated privacy concerns about foreign actors and his support for domestic surveillance authorities
Contradictions ledger →

What this scorecard does and doesn't claim

Every figure above is a count of records the platform already holds, each click-through-able to its source. The scorecard adds no inference, no forecast, and no narrative — it aggregates what is documented.

A populated scorecard is not a finding of corruption. It documents the volume of stated-vs-revealed tension, donor-adjacent silence, and broken commitments on the public record for this official. Silence in particular is the absence of an expected statement; it can have innocent explanations and is never presented as proof. Read each item's source before drawing conclusions.

⌗ Cite this
Permalinkhttps://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/mark-warner
CitationGoblin House. "Mark Warner — Responsibility Scorecard" (accountability scorecard). Goblin House — The Architecture of Secrecy. Accessed October 17, 2026. https://www.goblinhouse.net/scorecard/mark-warner.

Sourced from public records and content-hashed; verify via /attestation, standard at /methodology.