Raphael Warnock dossier →

• other / unclassified
  Interested donors: King & Spalding Nonpartisan Committee For Good Government, National Council Of Textile Organizations Inc Political Action Committee, Insured Retirement Institute PAC (Iri PAC)
  King & Spalding Nonpartisan Committee For Good Government, National Council Of Textile Organizations Inc Political Action Committee, Insured Retirement Institute PAC (Iri PAC) (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $7,500 (2024), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified

• S.J.Res. 37/38 NAY 2025-04-03
  Sanders Resolutions to Block Arms Sales to Israel (April 2025)
  why contradicted?

  [reversal] Warnock reversed his November 2024 position and voted AGAINST blocking $8.8 billion in arms sales to Israel. He was one of only four Senate Democrats to flip (alongside Ossoff, Shaheen, and King). The reversal came after intense backlash from Georgia's Jewish community, which had condemned his November vote. The AJC noted Jewish organizations including AIPAC and the Atlanta Jewish Community Relations Council had warned both senators that their earlier votes damaged trust. Conversely, pro-Palestinian activists criticized the flip as a capitulation to the pro-Israel lobby. This is one of the most dramatic same-policy-question reversals in the 119th Congress.

No documented broken promises on file.

• reversal SCORE 90
  Warnock supported the Sanders arms-blocking resolution in November 2024, then flipped to oppose a nearly identical resolution in April 2025 — one of only four Senate Democrats to reverse — and then reversed again in July 2025 to support limiting assault rifle sales to Israel. The three-position shift within eight months on the same policy question (U.S. arms transfers to Israel) illustrates extraordinary cross-pressure between Georgia's Jewish community (which condemned his initial vote) and progressive activists (who protested his reversal).
• platform_vs_vote SCORE 60
  Warnock calls comprehensive immigration reform his 'north star' and champions a pathway to citizenship, yet voted for the Laken Riley Act — which civil liberties groups called a 'sweeping assault on core principles' — citing the need to 'address the issues at the heart of this bill' after a Georgia college student's murder. His yes vote placed him among the most conservative Senate Democrats on immigration enforcement, though he noted the bill 'isn't the legislation I would have written.'
• same_source_inconsistency SCORE 30
  [auto-downgraded: both claims come from the same source host] Warnock preaches economic justice from MLK's pulpit and publicly opposes evictions, yet his own church's low-income apartment building evicted tenants for as little as $28.55 in past-due rent while Warnock received a $7,417 monthly housing allowance from the same church and lived rent-free in a $1 million church-owned home. The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed an ethics complaint alleging the rent-free housing was an unreported gift violating Senate rules. Warnock refused to say whether he tithes to the church.