1. Edge A→B: US Department of Defense (Pentagon) → Booz Allen Hamilton (relationship: funding-type, "As top Republican on Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Calvert receives donations from defense contractors; Booz Allen is a major defense contractor in the known entities list, though not explicitly named in provided donation records."). 2. Edge B→C: Booz Allen Hamilton → Ken Calvert (relationship: authority-type, "As chair of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Calvert sponsored and passed an $833 billion defense spending bill (H.R. 8774) in 2024, and his subcommittee oversees federal contract funding for defense companies that donate to his campaign."). 3. Edge C→A: Ken Calvert → US Department of Defense (Pentagon) (relationship: benefit-type, "Booz Allen Hamilton is a major government contractor with significant Department of Defense business, as evidenced by its status as a publicly traded company with regular SEC filings and known reputation in the federal contracting space. The company's consistent SEC filing history indicates ongoing substantial government contract work."). Each edge is independently documented in the connections table (IDs 13404, 13399, 561). Together they form a directed cycle: money flows from A, authority flows through B, benefit returns to A. This is the structural definition of a closed conflict-of-interest loop.
Anyone can re-execute this query to verify the published value. If the result diverges, the finding auto-flags as stale.
SELECT (
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=105 AND entity_b_id=11013) OR (entity_a_id=11013 AND entity_b_id=105)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%investor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donation%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contributor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contribution%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%funder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%co-founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%shareholder%'))
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=11013 AND entity_b_id=94) OR (entity_a_id=94 AND entity_b_id=11013)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory_oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulator%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee_membership%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%chair%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointed_by%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supervisor%'))
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=94 AND entity_b_id=105) OR (entity_a_id=105 AND entity_b_id=94)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor_relationship%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%client%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supplier%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%vendor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%grant_recipient%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%former_employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%consultant%'))
)::int AS value
Each question can be commissioned at the matching investigation tier.