Closed loop: US Department of Defense (Pentagon) → Leidos → Robert J. Wittman → US Department of Defense (Pentagon)

Involved entities

Inference logic

1. Edge A→B: US Department of Defense (Pentagon) → Leidos (relationship: funding-type, "Misc Defense is a top contributing industry ($248,311) and Leidos is a major defense contractor; Wittman sits on the committee that oversees defense spending.").
2. Edge B→C: Leidos → Robert J. Wittman (relationship: authority-type, "Wittman's role as Vice Chair of the House Armed Services Committee gives him direct oversight of Department of Defense appropriations and the National Defense Authorization Act.").
3. Edge C→A: Robert J. Wittman → US Department of Defense (Pentagon) (relationship: benefit-type, "Leidos is documented as a major defense contractor with $15B+ annual revenue and top-5 contractor status, though direct USASpending contracts were not found in the queried databases.").
Each edge is independently documented in the connections table (IDs 17376, 17373, 17038). Together they form a directed cycle: money flows from A, authority flows through B, benefit returns to A. This is the structural definition of a closed conflict-of-interest loop.

Source edges (3)

• Leidos ↔ US Department of Defense (Pentagon) — contractor (Leidos is documented as a major defense contractor with $15B+ annual revenue and top-5 contractor status, though direct USASpending contracts were not found in the queried databases.)
• Robert J. Wittman ↔ US Department of Defense (Pentagon) — oversight (Wittman's role as Vice Chair of the House Armed Services Committee gives him direct oversight of Department of Defense appropriations and the National Defense Authorization Act.)
• Robert J. Wittman ↔ Leidos — donor (Misc Defense is a top contributing industry ($248,311) and Leidos is a major defense contractor; Wittman sits on the committee that oversees defense spending.)

Comparative baseline

Steelman — strongest benign interpretation

Sensitivity

Replication query (SQL)

Anyone can re-execute this query to verify the published value. If the result diverges, the finding auto-flags as stale.

SELECT (
      EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=107 AND entity_b_id=11163) OR (entity_a_id=11163 AND entity_b_id=107)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%investor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donation%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contributor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contribution%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%funder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%co-founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%shareholder%'))
      AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=11163 AND entity_b_id=94) OR (entity_a_id=94 AND entity_b_id=11163)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory_oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulator%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee_membership%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%chair%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointed_by%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supervisor%'))
      AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=94 AND entity_b_id=107) OR (entity_a_id=107 AND entity_b_id=94)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor_relationship%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%client%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supplier%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%vendor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%grant_recipient%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%former_employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%consultant%'))
    )::int AS value

Questions this raises

Each question can be commissioned at the matching investigation tier.

• SEED — $5 What is the timeline of these three relationships — does US Department of Defense (Pentagon)'s support of Leidos predate Leidos's authority over Robert J. Wittman?
• SKETCH — $20 What is the dollar value flowing on each edge over the past five years?
• SKETCH — $20 Are there public records of Leidos recusing from any decision involving Robert J. Wittman?
• DOSSIER — $75 Map every contract, grant, or appointment between the three entities since the loop closed.