Closed loop: US Navy → Leidos → Trent Kelly → US Navy

Involved entities

Inference logic

1. Edge A→B: US Navy → Leidos (relationship: funding-type, "Leidos PAC donated $1,000 to Kelly's 2025-2026 campaign").
2. Edge B→C: Leidos → Trent Kelly (relationship: authority-type, "As Chairman of Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, Kelly has direct oversight of Navy programs and Naval Air Station Meridian borders his district").
3. Edge C→A: Trent Kelly → US Navy (relationship: benefit-type, "Leidos is a defense contractor that provides services to the US Navy.").
Each edge is independently documented in the connections table (IDs 13616, 13627, 19233). Together they form a directed cycle: money flows from A, authority flows through B, benefit returns to A. This is the structural definition of a closed conflict-of-interest loop.

Source edges (3)

• Trent Kelly ↔ Leidos — donor (Leidos PAC donated $1,000 to Kelly's 2025-2026 campaign)
• Trent Kelly ↔ US Navy — oversight (As Chairman of Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, Kelly has direct oversight of Navy programs and Naval Air Station Meridian borders his district)
• US Navy ↔ Leidos — contractor (Leidos is a defense contractor that provides services to the US Navy.)

Comparative baseline

Steelman — strongest benign interpretation

Sensitivity

Replication query (SQL)

Anyone can re-execute this query to verify the published value. If the result diverges, the finding auto-flags as stale.

SELECT (
      EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=107 AND entity_b_id=11117) OR (entity_a_id=11117 AND entity_b_id=107)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%investor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%donation%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contributor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contribution%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%funder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%co-founder%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%shareholder%'))
      AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=11117 AND entity_b_id=83) OR (entity_a_id=83 AND entity_b_id=11117)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory_oversight%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulatory%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%regulator%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee_membership%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%committee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%chair%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointed_by%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%appointment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supervisor%'))
      AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM connections WHERE ((entity_a_id=83 AND entity_b_id=107) OR (entity_a_id=107 AND entity_b_id=83)) AND (relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%contractor_relationship%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%client%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%supplier%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%vendor%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%grant_recipient%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employment%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%former_employee%' OR relationship_type ILIKE '%consultant%'))
    )::int AS value

Questions this raises

Each question can be commissioned at the matching investigation tier.

• SEED — $5 What is the timeline of these three relationships — does US Navy's support of Leidos predate Leidos's authority over Trent Kelly?
• SKETCH — $20 What is the dollar value flowing on each edge over the past five years?
• SKETCH — $20 Are there public records of Leidos recusing from any decision involving Trent Kelly?
• DOSSIER — $75 Map every contract, grant, or appointment between the three entities since the loop closed.