[ Enter Database → ]
[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
// Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
CongressOfficials → Randy Fine

Randy Fine

Republican · Representative, FL ·6
Score Components
4 LOW
Connection Density 20%
0 → 0
Donor Influence 10%
0 → 0
Silence Risk 25%
0 → 0
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 10%
42 → 4
Constituency Deviation 5%
0 → 0
Voting Misalignment 5%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Homeownership rate: 75.4%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty rate: 13.7%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median age: 48.4
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median household income: $64,612
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Total population: 816,594
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Florida Amendment 4 (Abortion Rights) (2024) — failed, margin 57.1% to 42.9%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Florida Amendment 3 (Marijuana Legalization) (2024) — failed, margin 56.5% to 43.5%
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 72 (share 0.11)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 44-45 (share 0.14)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 62 (share 0.14)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1500 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Halifax Health (5800 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: AdventHealth Daytona Beach (3200 employees)
secondary
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Florida's 6th Congressional District encompasses east-central Florida coastal areas including Daytona Beach, Port Orange, New Smyrna Beach, and parts of Volusia and Flagler counties. The district has a median age of 48.4 and is demographically 71.3% White, 11.5% Hispanic, and 11.0% Black. Economic activity centers on
secondary
Voted yea_unverified on H.R.7084 (Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act) on 2026-03-27: FL-06 has significant tourism and hospitality employment dependent on international visitor flows and digital platform access; the vote supported restrictive tech legislation while aligning with party-line national security framing, creat
inferential · 2026-03-27
Top industry sectors contributing to Fine's campaign: Pharmaceutical/cannabis-related industries ($32,500 combined), Human Rights ($9,000), For-profit Education ($13,312), Public officials ($6,500).
secondary · 2026-02-02
Top contributing organizations to Fine's 2025-2026 campaign per OpenSecrets aggregation: American Israel Public Affairs Cmte ($237,283), Physicians Dialysis ($10,526), Verano ($10,410), Cresco Labs ($10,000), Trulieve ($10,000).
secondary · 2026-02-02
Randy Fine's campaign committee (RANDY FINE FOR CONGRESS, C00893271) raised $3,719,022 total in the 2025-2026 cycle as of March 31, 2026, with $2,150,104 from individual contributions, $396,860 from other committee/PAC contributions, and $950,000 in candidate loans.
primary · 2026-03-31
No connections mapped
BillVoteDateAlignment
Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act yea_unverified 2026-03-27 mixed
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Never
No active silences
No donor interests mapped
No constituency baseline modelled
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Silence Risk25%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Contradiction Risk25%Stated positions contradicted by voting record (recent findings boosted)
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups
Intelligence Volume10%Documented facts from verified sources (logarithmic scale)
Donor Influence10%Distinct donors with interests overlapping committee jurisdiction
Constituency Deviation5%Gap between district priorities and legislative focus
Voting Misalignment5%Floor votes contradicting stated platform positions

Each component produces a raw score 0–100. The weighted sum yields the overall score. Tier thresholds: Critical ≥ 45, High ≥ 36, Elevated ≥ 22, Moderate ≥ 10, Low < 10.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

View Full Entity Profile →