[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Mark Warner

Mark Warner

Democratic · Senator, VA ·Since 2021-01-03
Score Components
68 ELEVATED
Connection Density 20%
93 → 19
Donor Influence 15%
95 → 14
Silence Risk 25%
69 → 17
Contradiction Risk 25%
48 → 12
Intelligence Volume 15%
36 → 5
Constituency Deviation 0%
11 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Unemployment Rate: 3%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: 2024 Presidential Vote (Harris): 54%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Bachelor's Degree or Higher: 40.2%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Poverty Rate: 9.9%
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Demographic anchor: Median Household Income: $87,249
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Virginia Constitutional Amendment - Property Tax Exemption for Veterans (2024) — passed, margin broad support
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Ballot measure: Virginia Constitutional Amendment - Transportation Funds (2024) — passed, margin broad support
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 51 - Information (Tech/Telecom) (share 0.05)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 31-33 - Manufacturing (Defense) (share 0.06)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 92 - Public Administration (Federal Government) (share 0.12)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Dominant industry: NAICS 54 - Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (share 0.15)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Northrop Grumman (10000 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Huntington Ingalls Industries (25000 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] Top employer: Federal Government (including Pentagon) (140000 employees)
secondary ✓ Verified
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Virginia is a statewide Senate constituency with 8.7 million residents. The state has a strong federal government and defense sector presence, with 20.1% of the workforce employed in government (significantly above national average). Virginia voted 62% for Biden in 2020 and 54% for Harris in 2024, indicating strong Democratic lean. The state has a highly educated population…
[ Show full fact ]
[constituency_baseline] District summary: Virginia is a statewide Senate constituency with 8.7 million residents. The state has a strong federal government and defense sector presence, with 20.1% of the workforce employed in government (significantly above national average). Virginia voted 62% for Biden in 2020 and 54% for Harris in 2024, indicating strong Democratic lean. The state has a highly educated population centered around the Washington D.C. suburbs, with major employers including defense contractors (Northrop Grumman, Huntington Ingalls Industries, General Dynamics), federal agencies, and tech firms. Virginia has not voted for a Republican for President since 2004.
secondary ✓ Verified
Voted yea on H.R. 6570 (TikTok Divestment Act) on 2024-03-13: Warner led bipartisan coalition pushing TikTok ban. While framed as national security, the legislation raises concerns about speech censorship precedent. Virginia's strong Democratic lean suggests constituent preference for measured tech regulation rather than outright bans. Warner's aggressive push on this legislation aligned with Intelligence Committee…
[ Show full fact ]
Voted yea on H.R. 6570 (TikTok Divestment Act) on 2024-03-13: Warner led bipartisan coalition pushing TikTok ban. While framed as national security, the legislation raises concerns about speech censorship precedent. Virginia's strong Democratic lean suggests constituent preference for measured tech regulation rather than outright bans. Warner's aggressive push on this legislation aligned with Intelligence Committee priorities over broader constituent preferences on tech policy
primary · 2024-03-13 ✓ Verified
Voted yea on S. 686 (RESTRICT Act) on 2023-03-07: Warner authored the RESTRICT Act, giving Commerce Department broad power to ban foreign tech products. While marketed as targeting TikTok/Huawei, civil liberties groups warned the vague language could restrict VPNs and enable censorship. Warner's venture capital background in tech investments creates potential conflicts: he positions himself as a reformer protecting…
[ Show full fact ]
Voted yea on S. 686 (RESTRICT Act) on 2023-03-07: Warner authored the RESTRICT Act, giving Commerce Department broad power to ban foreign tech products. While marketed as targeting TikTok/Huawei, civil liberties groups warned the vague language could restrict VPNs and enable censorship. Warner's venture capital background in tech investments creates potential conflicts: he positions himself as a reformer protecting Americans from foreign tech threats while his career was built on US tech sector success that could benefit from competitors being banned
primary · 2023-03-07 ✓ Verified
Voted yea on H.R. 7888 (Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (FISA Section 702 Reauthorization)) on 2024-04-19: Warner, as Senate Intelligence Chair, led advocacy for reauthorizing warrantless surveillance powers. The bill did not require the FBI to obtain warrants before searching 702 data for Americans' communications - despite documented FBI compliance failures. Virginia voters have shown strong…
[ Show full fact ]
Voted yea on H.R. 7888 (Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (FISA Section 702 Reauthorization)) on 2024-04-19: Warner, as Senate Intelligence Chair, led advocacy for reauthorizing warrantless surveillance powers. The bill did not require the FBI to obtain warrants before searching 702 data for Americans' communications - despite documented FBI compliance failures. Virginia voters have shown strong support for privacy protections (state voted 62% for Biden in 2020). Warner's push for surveillance expansion over civil liberties protections represents a cross-pressure conflict between intelligence community priorities and constituent privacy preferences
primary · 2024-04-19 ✓ Verified
[statement] Congress has done nothing on any guardrails for social media - pushing for tech regulation
primary · 2023-05-21 ✓ Verified
[statement] Warner stated FISA Section 702 reauthorization was necessary for national security. In recent weeks, I was informed of the decision NSA publicly announced
primary · 2024-04-19 ✓ Verified
Raphael Warnock colleague Both are U.S. Senators from the Democratic Party who serve together in the Senate.
Jeanne Shaheen colleague Both are U.S. Senators from the Democratic Party who serve together in the Senate.
Sheldon Whitehouse colleague Both are U.S. Senators listed among known entities.
Tim Kaine colleague Both are U.S. Senators from Virginia, serving as the state's Senate delegation together.
Raphael Warnock similar_surname_confusion List includes 'Raphael G. Warnock' — name confusion possible due to partial phonetic similarity and both being senators, but no documented connection found.
Jack Reed colleague Both are U.S. Senators from the Democratic Party who serve together in the Senate.
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence committee counterpart Mark Warner chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the Senate counterpart to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Chip Roy colleague Chip Roy and Mark Warner are both listed in the known entities database as political figures, suggesting they may serve together on committees or in Congress.
Quiver Quantitative financial reporting Warner's estimated net worth of $198.2 million and ranking as 9th highest in Congress is sourced from Quiver Quantitative live estimates.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee membership Mark Warner is listed as a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in the known entities list.
Elizabeth Warren colleague Both serve as Democratic Senators (Warner-Virginia, Warren-Massachusetts) working on technology policy and financial regulation.
Alex Karp possible_associated_entity Both appear in the same database context. Mark Warner (as Senator) and Alex Karp (Palantir CEO) could have had interactions regarding government contracts…
Michael Bennet collaboration Both serve in the U.S. Senate and have co-sponsored bills, including on intelligence and technology issues.
Alex Padilla collaboration Both serve in the U.S. Senate and have worked together on technology and election security issues.
H. Morgan Griffith affiliation Virginia Senator Warner stated H.R. 1 (which Griffith supported) would 'rip health care and nutrition assistance away from hundreds of thousands of people in…
Senate Judiciary Committee membership Mark Warner is a U.S. Senator and serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee based on his official congressional roles.
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence membership Mark Warner is a U.S. Senator and serves on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence based on his official congressional roles.
Senate Finance Committee membership Mark Warner is a U.S. Senator and serves on the Senate Finance Committee based on his official congressional roles.
Elissa Slotkin colleague Both are U.S. Senators from the Democratic Party who serve together in the Senate.
Chris Van Hollen colleague Both are U.S. Senators from the Democratic Party who serve together in the Senate.
BillVoteDateAlignment
A bill to amend chapter 131 of title 5 to require certain restrictions on… Nay 2026-09-30 unknown
A bill to amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to… Nay 2026-09-30 unknown
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of… Yea 2026-09-29 unknown
A resolution requesting information on Israel's human rights practices… Yea 2026-09-29 unknown
A bill to protect the name, image, and likeness rights of, and provide… Yea 2026-09-28 unknown
A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of… Yea 2026-09-24 unknown
A bill to protect the name, image, and likeness rights of, and provide… Yea 2026-09-24 unknown
A bill to protect the name, image, and likeness rights of, and provide… Yea 2026-09-17 unknown
A bill to protect the name, image, and likeness rights of, and provide… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
To provide for a system of regulation of the offer and sale of digital… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require voters to provide… Nay 2026-08-08 unknown
An act making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2027… Yea 2026-08-08 unknown
An act to impose sanctions and other measures with respect to the Russian… Yea 2026-08-07 unknown
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of… Yea 2026-08-05 unknown
A bill to extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from… Yea 2026-08-03 unknown
An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive… Nay 2026-07-30 unknown
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from… Yea 2026-07-30 unknown
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of… Yea 2026-07-30 unknown
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Yea 2026-07-29 unknown
An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive… Nay 2026-07-29 unknown
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Yea 2026-07-28 unknown
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from… Yea 2026-07-23 unknown
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of… Yea 2026-07-16 unknown
An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2027 for military… Nay 2026-07-14 unknown
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from… Yea 2026-06-24 unknown
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of… Yea 2026-06-24 unknown
A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of… Yea 2026-06-23 unknown
A bill a bill to increase the supply of housing in America, and for other… Yea 2026-06-22 unknown
A bill a bill to increase the supply of housing in America, and for other… Yea 2026-06-18 unknown
A resolution requesting information on Honduras's human rights practices… Yea 2026-06-17 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
statement_vs_disclosure 60/100
Platform: "As Senate Intelligence Chair, I am concerned about Chinese government access to American data through TikTok - a company that has no option other to respond to the needs of the Communist Party of China"
Vote: on "Congress has done nothing on any guardrails for social media - pushing for tech regulation"
Warner presents himself as a reformer pushing for tech accountability and privacy guardrails, yet his personal financial portfolio contains $98.6 million in diversified ETF holdings including broad market funds that would benefit from less restrictive tech regulation. His venture capital background at Columbia…
[ Show full analysis ]
Warner presents himself as a reformer pushing for tech accountability and privacy guardrails, yet his personal financial portfolio contains $98.6 million in diversified ETF holdings including broad market funds that would benefit from less restrictive tech regulation. His venture capital background at Columbia Capital invested in telecom and tech companies - sectors he now regulates as Intelligence Committee Chair
position_evolution 60/100
Platform: "As Senate Intelligence Chair, I am concerned about Chinese government access to American data through TikTok - a company that has no option other to respond to the needs of the Communist Party of China"
Vote: on "Warner stated FISA Section 702 reauthorization was necessary for national security. In recent…"
Warner publicly expressed strong concerns about privacy and government data collection when it involved a foreign adversary (TikTok/China), yet simultaneously pushed for reauthorization of warrantless surveillance powers under FISA Section 702 that allow the US government to collect and query communications without…
[ Show full analysis ]
Warner publicly expressed strong concerns about privacy and government data collection when it involved a foreign adversary (TikTok/China), yet simultaneously pushed for reauthorization of warrantless surveillance powers under FISA Section 702 that allow the US government to collect and query communications without individual warrants - creating a contradiction between his stated privacy concerns about foreign actors and his support for domestic surveillance authorities
Last silence detection: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:04:50 GMT (via scheduled run)
RESTRICT Act VPN and internet freedom concerns
410d silent
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair and author of the RESTRICT Act, Warner would be expected to address concerns that the legislation's broad language could enable restrictions on VPNs and other internet tools Evidence of activity on adjacent…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair and author of the RESTRICT Act, Warner would be expected to address concerns that the legislation's broad language could enable restrictions on VPNs and other internet tools Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During the window, Warner actively pushed TikTok ban legislation and gave interviews defending RESTRICT Act as targeting companies like Kaspersky, Huawei and TikTok. Public criticism emerged from civil liberties groups warning the act could enable mass censorship and VPN restrictions. Warner's public statements focused on national security justifications without addressing the internet freedom concerns raised by the bill's critics Primary URL: https://www.techdirt.com/2023/03/30/senator-warners-restrict-act-is-designed-to-create-the-great-firewall-of-america
FBI warrant requirement for FISA queries on Americans
110d silent
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair who pushed for FISA Section 702 reauthorization, Warner would be expected to address whether FBI should need warrants before searching surveillance data for Americans' communications Evidence of activity on…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Expected position: As Senate Intelligence Chair who pushed for FISA Section 702 reauthorization, Warner would be expected to address whether FBI should need warrants before searching surveillance data for Americans' communications Evidence of activity on adjacent topics: During the FISA reauthorization debate, Warner actively lobbied for passage of H.R. 7888 and gave floor speeches urging colleagues to vote yes. He was notably quiet on the controversial question of whether the bill adequately required warrants for FBI queries on Americans - an issue that caused divisions between civil liberties advocates and intelligence community. The final bill included modified but not full warrant requirements Primary URL: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/06/surveillance-politics-storm-mark-warner-00085479
corporate pacs, industry unlisted
Johnson Controls Inc. Federal PAC, Direct Supply, Inc. Partners PAC (Dsi Partners PAC), Hilltop Holdings Inc PAC, Taylor Morrison Inc. PAC, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation PAC, The Grant Thornton LLP Political Action Committee LLC, Accenture Inc. PAC, Kbr…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Johnson Controls Inc. Federal PAC, Direct Supply, Inc. Partners PAC (Dsi Partners PAC), Hilltop Holdings Inc PAC, Taylor Morrison Inc. PAC, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation PAC, The Grant Thornton LLP Political Action Committee LLC, Accenture Inc. PAC, Kbr Inc PAC, Asurion LLC Political Action Committee (Asurion PAC), Vmware, Inc. Political Action Committee (Vmware PAC), Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation PAC - Dtcc PAC, Transcanada USA Services PAC, Ericsson Inc. U.S. Employees Political Action Committee ('Ericsson PAC'), Slm Corporation PAC (Sallie Mae PAC), Iex Group Inc. PAC, Lseg Us Holdco Inc. PAC, Advansix Inc. Political Action Committee, Trellix PAC, Zillow Group, Inc. PAC (Zg PAC), C3.Ai, Inc PAC, Beyond Finance Employee PAC, Fair Isaac Corporation Political Action Committee (Fico PAC), Ionq, Inc. PAC, Optiver America LLC PAC (Optiver PAC), Galaxy Digital Services Ii LLC Political Action Committee (G, Coupang, Inc. Company PAC (Coupac), Teamhealth Holding Inc PAC, Mckinsey & Company, Inc. United States Political Action Committee (Mckinsey PAC), Avangrid PAC, Lpl Holdings Inc. Political Action Committee (Lpl PAC) (amounts: $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2024), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $7,500 (2024), $7,000 (2024), $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $7,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $7,500 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026)) — interest area: corporate pacs, industry unlisted
other / unclassified
Society For Cardiovascular Angiography And Interventions (Scai) PAC, Senate Future Fund, Alston & Bird PAC, National Association Of Enrolled Agents PAC, Lpl Holdings Inc. Political Action Committee (Lpl PAC), Moderate Democrats PAC, Fs PAC, Structured…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Society For Cardiovascular Angiography And Interventions (Scai) PAC, Senate Future Fund, Alston & Bird PAC, National Association Of Enrolled Agents PAC, Lpl Holdings Inc. Political Action Committee (Lpl PAC), Moderate Democrats PAC, Fs PAC, Structured Finance Coalition PAC (Structured Finance PAC), Loan Syndications And Trading Association PAC, Asco Association Political Action Committee (Asco Association PAC), Rev Up PAC, Americans For Responsible Innovation Ltd PAC, Abundance PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $6,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: other / unclassified
colleagues' leadership pacs
Motor City PAC, Turquoise PAC, PAC To The Future, Impact, M-PAC, Keystone America PAC, Holding Onto Oregon'S Priorities, Narragansett Bay PAC, Victory Now PAC, Frontline USA, Oceans PAC, Follow The North Star Fund, A New Direction PAC, Blue Wave Project…
[ Show full donor-interest summary ]
Motor City PAC, Turquoise PAC, PAC To The Future, Impact, M-PAC, Keystone America PAC, Holding Onto Oregon'S Priorities, Narragansett Bay PAC, Victory Now PAC, Frontline USA, Oceans PAC, Follow The North Star Fund, A New Direction PAC, Blue Wave Project, Nutmeg PAC, Purpose PAC, Off The Sidelines PAC, Pineapple PAC, Maple PAC, Perimeter PAC, Make It Work PAC, Hawaii PAC, Fair Shot PAC, All For Our Country PAC, Granite Values PAC, Smart Solutions PAC, Giddy Up PAC, Health Jobs Justice, Defend The Dream, Democracy Action Now PAC, Mitten PAC, Alsopac, 603 PAC, Defense Dem PAC, Blue Hen Federal PAC (amounts: $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2024), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026), $7,000 (2026), $5,000 (2026), $10,000 (2026)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
ideological & single-issue
Black Economic Alliance PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2026)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
Lpl Holdings Inc. Political Action Committee (Lpl PAC) Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $6,000 (2026)
Wine And Spirits Wholesalers Of America, Inc. PAC Alcohol & tobacco $5,000 (2026)
Boyd Gaming Corporation Political Action Committee Alcohol & tobacco $5,000 (2024)
Abundance PAC Other / unclassified $5,000 (2026)
Teamhealth Holding Inc PAC Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $5,000 (2026)
Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. PAC Defense & aerospace $5,000 (2026)
603 PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $7,000 (2026)
Circle Internet Group, Inc. PAC Crypto & fintech $5,000 (2026)
Americans For Responsible Innovation Ltd PAC Other / unclassified $5,000 (2026)
Coupang, Inc. Company PAC (Coupac) Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $7,500 (2026)
Galaxy Digital Services Ii LLC Political Action Committee (G Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $7,000 (2026)
Optiver America LLC PAC (Optiver PAC) Corporate PACs, industry unlisted $7,000 (2026)
Alsopac Colleagues' leadership PACs $10,000 (2026)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Federal Employment and Government Workforce Protection 92 75 20
Technology Regulation and Data Privacy 78 70 15
Intelligence and National Security Oversight 76 72 14
Defense Spending and Military Installations 88 80 12
Immigration and Border Policy 58 60 12
Tax Policy and Fiscal Responsibility 64 63 10
Healthcare Access and Costs 72 68 10
Small Business and Economic Development 68 65 10
Climate and Energy Policy 62 62 8
Education and Workforce Development 74 70 8
Transportation Infrastructure and Transit 70 78 6
Veterans Affairs and Military Family Support 66 75 5
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains, while 10 elected officials hold documented connections.
$17.5BDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Connected Officials
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →