2024
2024-12-31
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Subramanyam told constituents at a town hall that he took 'zero money' from AIPAC and 'AIPAC has not sent me any money,' but FEC records show AIPAC was his top donor at $37,250 including $5,000 directly from AIPAC's PAC. AIPAC Tracker fact-checked and contradicted his denial. His defense that he received 'far more money from people who oppose Israel' does not negate the discrepancy.
2024-12-31
VOTED CONTRA
Vote contradicts: statement_vs_disclosure
Subramanyam campaigned on reforming a campaign finance system corrupted by big money, yet his own fundraising relied overwhelmingly on large donors (74.19% of funds) and super PAC support ($691,412), with only 6.45% from small-dollar grassroots donors — mirroring the very system he pledged to reform.
What this view assembles
- Promises & violations — every documented commitment + each documented break, with primary sources.
- Contradiction pairs — fact-against-fact entries from the contradictions ledger; the "said" appears in its year, the "did" appears in its year.
- Vote-based analyses — for elected officials, every documented case where a vote diverged from a stated commitment.
- Entity events — major dated events recorded against the entity (acquisitions, indictments, appointments, etc.).
This view DOES NOT auto-detect new drift candidates. It surfaces records that are already on file. If you spot an undocumented inversion, the curator workflow (admin) is where to add it.
