Recent events
2020-09-01
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Palantir Technologies' SEC risk factor disclosures from 2019-2020 do not mention any material litigation, dispute, or contractual liability arising from the transfer of Project Maven from Google.
2019-12-20
Other facts
SECONDARY
Project Maven filed filing with the SEC on 2019-12-20. Accession number: N/A.
2019-09-27
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Project Maven appears in SEC EDGAR filings from late 2019, suggesting publicly traded companies disclosed involvement or exposure to this defense/AI initiative in their regulatory filings
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Q3/Q4 2019 SEC disclosures mentioning Project Maven most likely represent Palantir's first quarterly reporting requirements after contract assumption, rather than delayed Google liability disclosure
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
SEC disclosure requirements mandate material contract disclosure within specific timeframes, making Q3/Q4 2019 filings likely indicators of contract finalization or material change events occurring in mid-2019
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The absence of Project Maven references in earlier 2019 SEC filings suggests either new contractor onboarding or program classification changes that triggered first-time disclosure requirements
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Palantir's assumption of Maven contracts likely involved contractual assumption of Google's outstanding obligations, potentially generating separate insurance coverage disputes not labeled as 'Project Maven' litigation
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Project Maven SEC disclosures appearing in Q3/Q4 2019 coincide with the establishment of the Pentagon's Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) in June 2018, suggesting potential program integration or…
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
The Q3/Q4 2019 timing window for Project Maven SEC disclosures aligns precisely with the 12-15 month security clearance and contract transition timeline typical for classified defense AI programs
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Palantir's SEC filings from 2019 should be reviewed for mention of 'assumed obligations' or 'contingencies' related to the Maven program or Google's prior performance
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The pattern of SEC disclosure (material enough to mention in filings) without corresponding LDA disclosure (no Maven-specific lobbying reported) for Palantir in 2019 is consistent with either (a) Palantir lobbying on…
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Alphabet's 2018 10-K (filed February 2019) made no mention of Project Maven as a material legal proceeding, consistent with arbitration or settlement, but not proof of same.
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
If legitimate SEC disclosures about Project Maven occurred in Q3/Q4 2019, they would most likely appear in Palantir, Google/Alphabet, or defense contractor 10-K/10-Q filings as risk factors or material contract…
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
The attribution of SEC filings directly to Project Maven represents a data integrity failure that invalidates timeline-based analysis of contractor transitions, as Pentagon programs cannot file corporate disclosure…
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
SEC Material Adverse Change disclosure requirements would mandate Project Maven exposure disclosure within one quarterly reporting cycle if Google retained any ongoing legal or financial liability after withdrawal
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
SEC disclosure requirements for defense contractors mandate material contract disclosure within 90 days of award, making Q3 2019 filings consistent with summer 2019 contract finalization
2019-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The SEC filings from Q3 and Q4 2019 warrant examination to identify which specific companies disclosed Project Maven involvement and in what context (risk factors, revenue, contracts)
2019-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
The established primary facts contain a logical impossibility: Project Maven, a Pentagon program, cannot file SEC documents, indicating either misattribution of corporate filings mentioning Maven or data corruption in…
2018-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
The June 2018 JAIC establishment date creates a documented decision point that could explain Maven program restructuring independent of contractor performance issues
2018-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
Publicly searchable DoD directives, Congressional reports, and SEC filings as of mid-2018 do not contain explicit evidence that Project Maven functions were absorbed into JAIC, consistent with the consolidation…
2018-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The Pentagon's JAIC establishment in June 2018 coincided exactly with Google's Project Maven withdrawal, suggesting potential program consolidation rather than simple contractor replacement
2018-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
Google's voluntary withdrawal from Project Maven, rather than contract termination by the Pentagon, significantly reduced potential breach-of-contract litigation exposure
2018-06-15
Other facts
SECONDARY
JAIC's June 2018 establishment date creates a documented institutional milestone that could explain Maven program restructuring independent of contractor transitions
2018-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The absence of employee whistleblower litigation related to Project Maven ethics objections, despite documented internal Google resistance, suggests either successful pre-litigation settlement or use of internal…
2018-06-15
Other facts
INFERENTIAL
The Pentagon's JAIC establishment in June 2018 coincided exactly with Google's Maven withdrawal, suggesting potential program consolidation timing that could explain extended transition periods
+4 earlier events on the chart
