[CAPTURE PORTAL] 119TH CONGRESS
Legislative Integrity Monitor
Goblin House Intelligence
Congress → Officials → Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi

Democratic · Representative, CA ·11 ·Since 2025-01-03
Score Components
25 LOW
Connection Density 20%
92 → 18
Donor Influence 15%
15 → 2
Silence Risk 25%
7 → 2
Contradiction Risk 25%
0 → 0
Intelligence Volume 15%
14 → 2
Constituency Deviation 0%
25 → 0
Voting Misalignment 0%
0 → 0
% = weight in composite score · Raw component 0–100 × weight = weighted contribution (→) · Sum of contributions = overall score. Hover a row for details.
No intelligence collected yet
Elizabeth Warren colleague Elizabeth Warren and Nancy Pelosi are both Democratic leaders who have collaborated on legislative priorities including financial reform and healthcare.
Jim Jordan colleague Both listed as known entities in the database; both are members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Andrew Garbarino House Leadership (Speaker at time) Voted for infrastructure and marriage equality bills while Nancy Pelosi was House Speaker and Majority Leader.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez colleague Both are Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Gilbert Ray Cisneros political_vote Cisneros voted for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House with his very first vote as a member of Congress on January 3, 2019, despite having signed a letter in…
Mike Ezell Political Attack Target Ezell's primary opponent attacked his debt ceiling vote as a vote with 'Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi'.
Glenn Thompson competitor Thompson voted against legislation supported by Pelosi (e.g., Respect for Marriage Act, American Rescue Plan, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act).
Chuck Schumer affiliation Both appear in the known entities list, suggesting documented political relationship as Democratic leadership
Elizabeth Warren Same political party Both are Democratic members of Congress (Pelosi in House, Warren in Senate) and have worked together on legislation.
Patrick Gaspard political_alignment Gaspard worked with Pelosi as part of Democratic Party leadership and political operations.
James P. McGovern colleague Both serve as Democratic members of Congress from California and Massachusetts respectively.
Linda T. Sánchez party leadership (caucus role) Served as Vice Chair of the House Democratic Caucus (2017-2019) under Speaker Pelosi's leadership.
Donald Norcross fundraiser headliner Past fundraiser headliners for Norcross have included Nancy Pelosi, reflecting his connections to national Democratic leadership.
Morgan McGarvey comparison McGarvey's 106% stock portfolio return in 2024 surpassed Pelosi's 71% return, as reported by Quiver Quantitative and New York Post.
Chuck Schumer colleague Both Nancy Pelosi and Charles E. Schumer are members of the U.S. Congress listed in the known entities database.
Steny H. Hoyer colleague Both Nancy Pelosi and Steny H. Hoyer are members of the U.S. Congress listed in the known entities database.
Hakeem Jeffries colleague Both Nancy Pelosi and Hakeem S. Jeffries are members of the U.S. Congress listed in the known entities database.
Mitch McConnell colleague McConnell, as Senate Republican Leader, worked with then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi on legislative matters; both appear as known entities.
Roger Wicker quoted_interaction After Wicker voted Nay on the American Rescue Plan Act despite supporting the restaurant relief within it, Pelosi stated: 'Vote no and take the dough.'
Thomas D'Alesandro Jr. family Nancy Pelosi is the daughter of Thomas D'Alesandro Jr.
BillVoteDateAlignment
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood… Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Water Resources Development Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Ratepayer Protection Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
PROOF Act Nay 2026-09-16 unknown
Retire through Ownership Act Yea 2026-09-16 unknown
Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes… Present 2026-09-15 unknown
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers… Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Diesel Emissions Reduction Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Whistleblower Protection Act Yea 2026-09-15 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 9576 and H.R. 10326, providing… Nay 2026-09-15 unknown
GUARD Act Not Voting 2026-09-15 unknown
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species Strike Team Act Yea 2026-09-14 unknown
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act Nay 2026-09-03 unknown
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require… Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
Protecting Domestic Mining Act Nay 2026-09-02 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
AGOA Extension Act Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period… Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
In the matter of allegations relating to Representative Chuck Edwards Yea 2026-09-01 unknown
Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 1501, H.R. 9436, and H.R… Nay 2026-09-01 unknown
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act Not Voting 2026-08-31 unknown
Last contradiction analysis: Never
No contradictions detected
Last silence detection: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:49:23 GMT (via scheduled run)
ai policy & data privacy
Pacer Capital — interest area: ai policy & data privacy
colleagues' leadership pacs
Gridiron-PAC (amounts: $5,000 (2024)) — interest area: colleagues' leadership pacs
ideological & single-issue
Women'S Political Committee Federal, End Citizens United (amounts: $5,000 (2024), $10,000 (2024)) — interest area: ideological & single-issue
National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC (Nbwa PAC) Alcohol & tobacco $5,000 (2024)
American Israel Public Affairs Committee PAC Law & lobbying firms $5,000 (2024)
End Citizens United Ideological & single-issue $10,000 (2024)
Gridiron-PAC Colleagues' leadership PACs $5,000 (2024)
JStreetPAC Pro-Israel groups $6,000 (2024)
Allied Pilots Association Political Action Committee Labor unions $5,000 (2024)
Comcast Corporation & Nbcuniversal PAC - Federal Telecom & media $5,000 (2024)
National Air Traffic Controllers Assoc PAC Labor unions $5,000 (2024)
Women'S Political Committee Federal Ideological & single-issue $5,000 (2024)
National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC (Nbwa PAC) Alcohol, tobacco & gambling $5,000 (2024)
Joint Action Committee For Political Affairs Pro-Israel groups $5,000 (2024)
National Multifamily Housing Council PAC Real estate & construction $5,000 (2024)
American Crystal Sugar Company PAC Agriculture & food $10,000 (2026)
American Hospital Association PAC Health care & pharma $10,000 (2024)
Powerpac Of The Edison Electric Institute Utilities & nuclear $5,000 (2024)
TopicPriorityAlignmentDeviation
Banking Regulation and Consumer Financial Protection 60 35 45
Housing Affordability and Rent Burden 95 55 40
Veterans Benefits and Military Affairs 55 40 35
Government Accountability and Ethics 75 45 35
Homelessness and Behavioral Health Services 92 65 27
Education and Student Debt Relief 78 60 25
Disaster Preparedness and Coastal Resilience 80 65 22
Labor Rights and Worker Protections 85 70 20
Immigration and Sanctuary Protections 88 70 18
Climate Change and Environmental Protection 87 75 15
Gun Safety and Firearms Regulation 90 85 10
Women's History and Cultural Institutions 70 90 5
No platform commitments archived
No committee memberships recorded
Scoring Methodology

The Capture Risk Score is a composite 0–100 index measuring potential regulatory capture of elected officials. It is computed from seven weighted components:

ComponentWeightSignal
Contradiction Risk30%Stated positions contradicted by the record (recent findings boosted)
Donor Influence20%Distinct documented donors (FEC Schedule A PACs); inferred donors do not count
Connection Density20%Mapped relationships to lobbyists, contractors, interest groups; donor links excluded
Silence Risk15%Topics where donors have interests but the official is silent
Intelligence Volume15%Documented facts from verified sources
Constituency Deviation0%Shown, not weighted — a model estimate, not a record
Voting Misalignment0%Shown, not weighted — needs platform commitments almost nobody has; the roll-call record on /votes is the vote signal

Each component is the member's standing among all scored members of Congress, and the weighted sum is the overall score. Tiers are ranks: Critical is the top 5%, High the next 10%, Elevated the next 20%, Moderate the next 30%, and Low the rest.

Officials without at least 2 documented facts, 1 contradiction analysis, 1 voting record, or 1 constituency baseline are marked Insufficient Evidence and excluded from numeric ranking.

Contradiction findings from the last 180 days receive a recency boost. High-severity contradictions (score ≥ 70) receive additional weight.

Full methodology: /congress/methodology

[PUBLIC COST ESTIMATE]
Documented financial relationships span 0 money flow chains, while 10 elected officials hold documented connections.
$2.0BDonor Contributions
0Money Chains
0Traced Hops
Connected Officials
Calculation Methodology

Contract values are summed from documented money flow chains where this entity appears as a source or destination node. Amounts are drawn from USASpending.gov, FEC filings, SEC EDGAR, or LD-2 lobbying registrations.

Donor contributions aggregate documented amounts from the donor_interests table, sourced from FEC individual and PAC contribution filings.

Connected officials are elected officials in our database with a mapped relationship (lobbying, board membership, campaign contribution, etc.) to this entity.

Annualised flow represents the total documented dollar amount traced through money flow hops involving this entity. Where hop-level amounts are unavailable, the chain-level documented total is used as a conservative upper bound.

All figures are drawn from public filings. Estimates are conservative — undisclosed transactions, dark money, and vanish-point hops are excluded from totals. This is a minimum documented floor, not a ceiling.

View Full Entity Profile →